Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.5K
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

2.3K
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
2.3K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

756
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
756
Life Tables01:22

Life Tables

674
A life table is a statistical tool that summarizes the mortality and survival patterns of a population, providing detailed insights into the likelihood of survival or death across different age intervals within a cohort. By organizing data on survival probabilities and mortality rates, life tables offer a clear snapshot of population dynamics over time. They are extensively used in demography, public health, actuarial science, and ecology to analyze life expectancy, design health interventions,...
674
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

384
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
384
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

712
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
712

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Policy gaps regarding social homecare in the context of end-of-life; a policy document analysis.

BMC palliative care·2026
Same author

Data-based research in UK palliative care: guidance, challenges, opportunities.

BMJ supportive & palliative care·2026
Same author

Implementation of the new internal medicine training (IMT) curriculum (UK): a new and novel palliative care communication course; CoMPaSs.

BMJ supportive & palliative care·2026
Same author

What models of community palliative rehabilitation exist for adults in the United Kingdom? - a national cross-sectional survey.

BMC palliative care·2026
Same author

Decoding real-world visual scenes from alpha and gamma band flicker evoked oscillations in human EEG.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A computationally frugal, open-source chest CT foundation model for thoracic disease detection in lung cancer screening programmes.

Communications medicine·2026
Same journal

Age at menarche and adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: triangulating evidence from multivariable and Mendelian randomization analyses.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Life-course trajectories of cardiovascular disease risk factors in rural India: Andhra Pradesh Children and Parents Study (APCAPS) 2003-2023.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Young Lives study.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

From the departing Editors in Chief.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Data Resource Profile: Cheeloo Lifespan Electronic-health reseArch Data-library (Cheeloo LEAD).

International journal of epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Cohort Profile Update: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Cohort.

International journal of epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

Standardized mortality ratios.

Paul Taylor1

  • 1Centre for Health Informatics and Multiprofessional Education, University College London, Stephenson Way, London, NW1 2HE, UK. p.taylor@ucl.ac.uk.

International Journal of Epidemiology
|January 14, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) are used to assess hospital performance by adjusting for patient factors. This article reviews their UK origins, applications in critical incidents, and discusses strengths and weaknesses.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare performance measurement
  • Public health analytics
  • Hospital quality assessment

Background:

  • Mortality rates are increasingly utilized for comparing hospital and unit performance.
  • Standardized measures aim to adjust for 'expected' mortality based on patient characteristics.
  • This approach is particularly relevant in the UK context for evaluating healthcare quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the initial motivation for using standardized mortality measures in the UK.
  • To describe two recent incidents where these measures were crucial for decision-making.
  • To review the strengths and weaknesses of different standardized mortality approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the historical development of standardized mortality ratios in the UK.
  • Case study analysis of two incidents involving the use of mortality measures.
  • Critical review of methodologies for standardizing mortality data.
  • Description of current practices in applying standardized mortality ratios.

Main Results:

  • Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) have evolved from specific motivations within the UK healthcare system.
  • Mortality measures have played a critical role in high-stakes decision-making during specific healthcare incidents.
  • Various approaches to standardizing mortality data present distinct advantages and disadvantages.
  • Current practices involve the application of SMRs, though nuances in methodology persist.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized mortality ratios are a vital, albeit complex, tool for hospital performance evaluation.
  • Understanding the strengths and limitations of SMR methodologies is crucial for accurate interpretation.
  • The application of SMRs in critical incidents highlights their impact on healthcare decisions.
  • Continued review and refinement of SMR approaches are necessary for effective quality assessment.