Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

41.7K
Phylogenetic trees come in many forms. It matters in which sequence the organisms are arranged from the bottom to the top of the tree, but the branches can rotate at their nodes without altering the information. The lines connecting individual nodes can be straight, angled, or even curved.
41.7K
Phylogenetic Trees03:21

Phylogenetic Trees

5.7K
5.7K
Rationalizing Substitutions01:29

Rationalizing Substitutions

172
Integrals involving non-rational functions are often difficult to evaluate using standard techniques, especially when radicals appear in the integrand. Rationalizing substitution provides a systematic method for simplifying such integrals by converting them into rational forms that are easier to handle.Consider a rod whose linear mass density depends on a constant linear density, a characteristic length, and the distance from the left end of the rod. Determining the total mass requires...
172
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

11.1K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
11.1K
Microbial Phylogeny01:28

Microbial Phylogeny

88
Understanding the evolutionary relationships among microorganisms is fundamental to microbial ecology and taxonomy. Phylogenetic trees are essential tools for inferring these relationships, relying primarily on comparative analyses of molecular sequences such as DNA, RNA, or proteins. In microbial studies, these trees typically depict the evolutionary paths of diverse bacterial and archaeal species by mapping genetic differences accumulated over time.Phylogenetic trees are composed of tips,...
88
Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

499
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
499

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Derivation of a natural language processing algorithm to identify febrile infants.

Journal of hospital medicine·2022
Same author

Information Density and Syntactic Repetition.

Cognitive science·2015
Same author

Do grammars minimize dependency length?

Cognitive science·2011
Same author

Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2003

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.2K

Bayesian tree substitution grammars as a usage- based approach.

Matt Post1, Daniel Gildea2

  • 1Human Language Technology Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, MD 21211, USA. post@cs.jhu.edu

Language and Speech
|January 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Tree substitution grammar (TSG) offers a flexible alternative to context-free grammar (CFG) for computational linguistics. This study introduces a Bayesian approach to learn TSGs, improving parsing accuracy and grammaticality classification.

More Related Videos

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

720

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

35.2K
Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
05:33

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning

Published on: January 29, 2020

5.8K
A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

720

Area of Science:

  • Computational Linguistics
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Grammar Formalisms

Background:

  • Context-free grammars (CFGs) have limitations in representing linguistic structures.
  • Tree substitution grammars (TSGs) generalize CFGs by allowing larger rewrite fragments.
  • Usage-based approaches in linguistics require computational models for validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a computational model for learning Tree substitution grammars (TSGs).
  • To address the challenge of fragment set size in TSG learning.
  • To evaluate the performance of learned TSGs in linguistic tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A model-based approach using Gibbs sampling with a non-parametric prior was employed.
  • The method controls fragment size, favoring smaller fragments while allowing larger ones.
  • Grammars were learned and evaluated on parsing accuracy and grammaticality classification.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian TSGs achieved excellent performance on parsing and grammaticality tasks.
  • The learned grammars balance fragment size effectively.
  • Performance was competitive with existing TSG and Data-Oriented Parsing models.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed Bayesian TSG learning method is effective for computational modeling of linguistic theories.
  • This approach provides a practical solution to the fragment selection problem in TSGs.
  • The results demonstrate the utility of TSGs in capturing linguistic generalizations.