Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

08:08
Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses
Published on: June 16, 2020
6.9K
Arguments against intermating before selection in a self-fertilising species
1Faculty of Agriculture, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Summary
Intermating F2 populations offers benefits for genetic gain only when alleles are in repulsion phase. Population simulations indicate truncation selection is often superior to intermating for increasing desirable homozygotes.
Area of Science:
- Quantitative Genetics
- Plant Breeding
- Population Genetics
Background:
- Intermating F2 populations is a strategy to increase homozygosity and genetic gain.
- Understanding the conditions under which intermating is most beneficial is crucial for breeding programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the expected benefits of intermating F2 populations derived from crosses of two homozygous parents.
- To evaluate the impact of allelic phase and recombination frequency on the efficacy of intermating.
Main Methods:
- Population simulation was used to extend findings from two loci to multiple loci.
- The merit of intermating was quantified by the ratio of population variance after one cycle of intermating and selfing (V1) to the initial variance (V0).
Main Results:
- Intermating provides benefits primarily when alleles are in the repulsion phase.
- The gain from intermating decreases as recombination frequency increases, becoming consistently small when loci are spread across multiple chromosomes.
- Simulation studies demonstrated that truncation selection is generally more effective than intermating for increasing desirable homozygotes.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of intermating is highly dependent on the initial allelic phase and the genetic architecture of the trait.
- For most scenarios, particularly with higher recombination rates or loci on different chromosomes, truncation selection is a more efficient breeding strategy.
Related Concept Videos
Frequency-dependent Selection
20.1K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.1K
What is a Species?
41.4K
Overview
41.4K
Genetics of Speciation
19.0K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
19.0K
Formation of Species
36.9K
Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.
36.9K
Hybrid Zones
16.3K
Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.
16.3K
Limits to Natural Selection
30.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
30.0K

