Biomarkers and receptor targeted therapies reduce clinical trial risk in non-small-cell lung cancer

Adam Falconi1, Gilberto Lopes, Jayson L Parker

  • 1*Department of Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; †HCor Onco Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil and Oncoclínicas do Brasil, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil; ‡Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and §Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Insights

Clinical trial success rates for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) drugs are low (11%). Biomarker and receptor targeted therapies significantly improve success rates, making them crucial for NSCLC drug development.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Analyzed clinical trial failure risks for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) drug development from 1998 to 2012.
  • Investigated factors influencing clinical trial risk in NSCLC drug development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the overall clinical trial success rate for NSCLC drugs.
  • To identify key factors, such as targeted therapies and biomarkers, that impact NSCLC clinical trial outcomes.
  • To estimate the risk-adjusted cost of NSCLC drug development.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized clinical trial disclosures from clinicaltrials.gov and public resources for NSCLC drug development analysis.
  • Included compounds that began phase I clinical testing before 1998, used treatment-relevant endpoints, and completed phase I trials in NSCLC.
  • Conducted analysis based on treatment indication, compound classification, and mechanism of action.

Main Results:

  • 11% cumulative clinical trial success rate for NSCLC drugs, below industry averages.
  • Biomarker-targeted therapies (62%) and receptor-targeted therapies (31%) demonstrated the highest success rates.
  • Risk-adjusted cost for NSCLC clinical drug development estimated at $1.89 billion.

Conclusions:

  • Biomarker use increased clinical trial success sixfold, while receptor-targeted therapies nearly tripled it.
  • Physicians should prioritize NSCLC clinical trials incorporating biomarkers and receptor-targeted therapies.
  • Over half of NSCLC biomarkers lack FDA approval, highlighting a need for validation.

Related Concept Videos

Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
7.0K
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

1.4K
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine02:50

Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

Combining two or more treatment methods increases the life span of cancer patients while reducing damage to vital organs or tissue from the overuse of a single treatment. Combination therapy also targets different cancer-inducing pathways, thus reducing the chances of developing resistance to treatment.
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
4.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
627