[Focal therapy in urology: kidney cancer]

Focal therapy has gained attention in the treatment of small renal masses (SRM). However, its use is limited due to scarce data on long-term outcomes. The availability of such data is significantly lower as compared to the relevant data on surgery outcomes. At the same time, minimally invasive surgery has seen the development of laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery and, recently, robot-assisted surgery. Our purpose is to review the possibilities of treatment for SMR with particular attention on focal therapy. Clinical series and comprehensive reviews support safety and mid/long-term efficacy of renal cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation. Comparative studies and meta-analysis outlined oncological inferiority against partial nephrectomy in local tumor control. For smaller and more peripheral lesions, radiofrequency ablation showed best indications than cryoablation. There are significant demographic and tumor differences between patients treated by one or another approach. The correct indication for each treatment seems to be of key importance to achieve the best oncological and functional outcome. Open partial nephrectomy remains the gold standard treatment for PMR, but laparoscopic approaches have been showing similar results.