Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

953
Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role...
953
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

10.2K
Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
10.2K
Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System01:11

Sensory Perception: Organization of the Somatosensory System

8.4K
The somatosensory system is the central and peripheral nervous system component that senses and processes touch, pressure, pain, temperature, and body position or proprioception. The process of sensation takes place at three levels:
The receptor level:
The receptor level is the first stage of sensation. It involves the detection of a stimulus by specialized sensory receptors. The stimulus must arrive within the receptor's receptive field. Next, the receptor converts the energy of the...
8.4K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Tactile and Chemical Senses01:27

Tactile and Chemical Senses

1.6K
Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex.
1.6K
Gestalt Principles of Perception01:21

Gestalt Principles of Perception

1.8K
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same author

More Than a Material: Social Interpretation Shapes the Hedonic Evaluation of Human Hand Touch.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Unmasking deceptive decisions in a two-player competitive game: Integrating ERPs, spectral-perturbation signatures, and interpretable neural-network decoding.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Charting Decodability of Dynamic Facial Expressions in Young and Old Adults: Similarities and Differences.

Experimental neurobiology·2025
Same author

Seeing What Matters: Attentional (MIS-) Alignment between Humans and AI in VR-Simulated Prediction of Driving Accidents.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.4K

Touching on face space: comparing visual and haptic processing of face shapes.

Christian Wallraven1

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, wallraven@korea.ac.kr.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|January 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated if touch (haptics) creates a "face space" similar to vision. Results show both vision and touch process faces similarly, supporting a unified face-space framework.

More Related Videos

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

11.2K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS
04:40

Tactile Semiautomatic Passive-Finger Angle Stimulator TSPAS

Published on: July 30, 2020

2.4K
Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans
04:27

Using Facial Electromyography to Assess Facial Muscle Reactions to Experienced and Observed Affective Touch in Humans

Published on: March 15, 2019

11.2K
Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • The face space framework suggests structured representation of faces in the brain.
  • Recent research indicates faces can be recognized through touch (haptics).
  • The similarity between visual and haptic face processing remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if a haptic face space exists.
  • To compare the structure of a haptic face space with the established visual face space.
  • To investigate cross-modal similarities and differences in face perception.

Main Methods:

  • Creation of a physical face space using 3D laser-scanned faces and morphs.
  • Participants rated pairwise similarities of tangible 3D face shapes via vision or haptics.
  • Multidimensional scaling analysis to extract perceptual spaces from similarity ratings.

Main Results:

  • Both visual and haptic modalities generated perceptual spaces consistent with the face space framework.
  • Evidence supports similar processing of complex face shapes across vision and haptics.
  • Systematic differences were observed between visual and haptic data, suggesting modality-specific nuances.

Conclusions:

  • The findings provide support for a unified face space representation across different sensory modalities.
  • This research advances our understanding of cross-modal perception and complex shape processing.
  • Further investigation is needed to fully elucidate the differences in visual versus haptic face processing.