Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

14:58
Behavioral Tracking and Neuromast Imaging of Mexican Cavefish
Published on: April 6, 2019
7.2K
Effectiveness of an automatic tracking software in underwater motion analysis.
Fabrício A Magalhaes1, Zimi Sawacha2, Rocco Di Michele
1Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering, University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy.
Journal of Sports Science & Medicine
|January 15, 2014
Summary
A new software (DVP) effectively tracks underwater movements for sports science kinematic analysis, requiring fewer manual interventions than commercial options. This advancement aids athletes and coaches in aquatic sports by improving motion analysis efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics and Sports Science
- Computer Vision and Image Analysis
- Aquatic Sports Performance
Background:
- Kinematic analysis using marker tracking is crucial in sports science for athletes and coaches.
- Existing automatic tracking software is not optimized for underwater motion analysis.
- Underwater environments present unique challenges like low image quality and target occlusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a newly developed software (DVP) for automatic underwater motion tracking.
- To compare the DVP software's performance against a commercial tracking software (COM).
- To assess the degree of automation by measuring required manual interventions.
Main Methods:
- Developed DVP software utilizes the Kanade-Lucas-Tomasi feature tracker for automatic marker tracking.
- Manual tracking of 2940 marker positions across 21 aquatic exercise videos served as the ground truth.
- Automatic tracking was performed using DVP and COM software, with manual corrections triggered if marker position error exceeded 4 pixels.
Main Results:
- The DVP software required significantly fewer manual interventions (7.4%) compared to the commercial software (17.8%).
- DVP demonstrated lower manual intervention rates across different exercise modes (5.6%–29.3% reduction) and marker types (9.9% reduction).
- The results indicate a higher degree of automation for the DVP software in underwater kinematic analysis.
Conclusions:
- The developed DVP software is a valid and effective tool for automatic underwater motion analysis.
- DVP offers improved efficiency in kinematic analysis for swimming and other aquatic sports due to its high automation.
- The software's feature-tracking algorithm successfully addresses challenges in underwater environments, reducing the need for manual supervision.

