Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

46.6K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
46.6K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

215.1K
Overview
215.1K
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

8.2K
8.2K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

61.3K
Overview
61.3K
Trihybrid Crosses02:27

Trihybrid Crosses

24.6K
Trihybrid Crosses
Some of Mendel’s crosses examined three pairs of contrasting characteristics. Such a cross is called a trihybrid cross. A trihybrid cross is a combination of three individual monohybrid crosses. For example, plant height (tall vs. short), seed shape (round vs. wrinkled), and seed color (yellow vs. green).
The F1 generation plants of a trihybrid cross are heterozygous for all three traits and produce eight gametes. Upon self-fertilization, these gametes have an equal...
24.6K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

58.0K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
58.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Crosstalk between NRF2 and HIPK2 shapes cytoprotective responses.

Oncogene·2017
Same author

Factor analysis in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub).

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Impact of biparental mating on correlation coefficients in bread wheat.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Line x tester analysis for fixed effect model in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

A comparison of different diallel analyses.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Genetic variability and advance under four selection procedures in wheat pedigree breeding programme.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 4, 2026

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.0K

Parental generation in relation to combining ability analysis in spring barley.

J D Hayes1, R S Paroda

  • 1Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth, UK.

TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik
|January 16, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Excluding the parental generation in diallel analysis improves estimates of combining ability variances in spring barley. This method provides reliable ratios for general and specific combining ability across environments.

More Related Videos

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses
08:08

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Published on: June 16, 2020

6.9K
Measuring Gene Expression in Bombarded Barley Aleurone Layers with Increased Throughput
10:29

Measuring Gene Expression in Bombarded Barley Aleurone Layers with Increased Throughput

Published on: March 30, 2018

6.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 4, 2026

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions
07:03

Reliable Method for Assessing Seed Germination, Dormancy, and Mortality under Field Conditions

Published on: November 6, 2016

10.0K
Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses
08:08

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Published on: June 16, 2020

6.9K
Measuring Gene Expression in Bombarded Barley Aleurone Layers with Increased Throughput
10:29

Measuring Gene Expression in Bombarded Barley Aleurone Layers with Increased Throughput

Published on: March 30, 2018

6.2K

Area of Science:

  • Plant Breeding
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Agricultural Science

Background:

  • Diallel analysis is crucial for understanding genetic components of variation.
  • Griffing's methods are widely used for combining ability analysis.
  • Environmental interactions significantly influence plant performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Griffing's Method 1, Model I, with Method 3, Model I, for diallel analysis.
  • To assess the impact of including the parental generation on combining ability estimates.
  • To evaluate the influence of environmental interactions on genetic parameters in spring barley.

Main Methods:

  • A 10x10 diallel cross of spring barley was conducted across eight environments.
  • Griffing's Method 1 (including parents) and Method 3 (excluding parents) were applied.
  • Analysis focused on general combining ability (GCA) and specific combining ability (SCA) variances and effects.

Main Results:

  • Method 1 (including parents) introduced upward bias in GCA and SCA variance estimates.
  • Method 3 (excluding parents) yielded consistent GCA:SCA ratios across environments.
  • GCA variance proportion was higher than SCA variance, with significant environmental interactions for GCA.
  • GCA and SCA effects were similar between methods, and mean performance correlated with GCA effects.
  • Variety Cb 824 identified as a superior general combiner for earliness, likely due to dominant genes.

Conclusions:

  • Excluding the parental generation (Method 3) is recommended for unbiased combining ability analysis.
  • GCA plays a more significant role than SCA in spring barley, with substantial environmental influence.
  • Specific early varieties show potential for breeding programs aimed at enhancing earliness in barley.