Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

10:50
Computational Modeling of Retinal Neurons for Visual Prosthesis Research - Fundamental Approaches
Published on: June 21, 2022
2.3K
Structure-function mapping: variability and conviction in tracing retinal nerve fiber bundles and comparison to a
Jonathan Denniss1, Andrew Turpin, Fumi Tanabe
1Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|January 16, 2014
Summary
Human tracing of retinal nerve fiber bundles (RNFBs) shows variability, but generally aligns with a computational model. This variability impacts structure-function mapping accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Imaging
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Retinal nerve fiber bundles (RNFBs) are crucial for visual function.
- Accurate mapping of RNFBs to visual field defects is essential for diagnosing and monitoring optic neuropathies.
- Current methods for tracing RNFBs can be subjective and variable.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the variability and repeatability of human tracing of RNFBs.
- To compare human tracing of RNFBs with predictions from an anatomically-customized computational model.
- To assess the utility of a computational model for structure-function mapping in ophthalmology.
Main Methods:
- Eight clinicians and six naïve observers traced RNFBs from 24 visual field locations to the optic nerve head (ONH) in ten retinal images.
- Repeatability of tracing was assessed by three clinicians and two naïve observers over multiple sessions.
- A computational model predicted ONH sectors corresponding to visual field locations, and its predictions were compared to human tracings.
Main Results:
- Median between-observer variability in tracing was 27° for clinicians and 33° for naïve observers.
- Repeatability of tracing was better for clinicians (10°) than naïve observers (15°).
- The computational model showed good concordance with human tracings, with median absolute differences of 17° for clinicians and 20° for naïve observers.
Conclusions:
- The computational model demonstrates good agreement with human RNFB tracing.
- RNFB tracing variability is a critical factor to consider when performing structure-function mapping.
- The model shows potential for improving the accuracy and consistency of structure-function analysis in ophthalmology.

