Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026
16:43
Murine Spinotrapezius Model to Assess the Impact of Arteriolar Ligation on Microvascular Function and Remodeling
Published on: March 3, 2013
12.1K
Suture button suspension following trapeziectomy in a cadaver model
Yohan Song1, Christopher A Cox1, Jeffrey Yao2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 450 Broadway St, Pavilion C, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA.
Hand (New York, N.Y.)
|January 16, 2014
Summary
Suture-button suspensionplasty post-trapeziectomy shows similar thumb motion and safety regardless of proximal or distal device trajectory. Both methods ensure the implant is safely positioned away from nerves.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Hand surgery
- Biomechanical analysis
Background:
- The optimal trajectory for suture-button suspensionplasty after trapeziectomy is not well-defined.
- Understanding the impact of trajectory on thumb motion and implant safety is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and effects of proximal versus distal suture-button trajectories on thumb motion after trapeziectomy.
Main Methods:
- A cadaveric model was used to evaluate thumb range of motion, trapeziectomy space height, and device proximity to the first dorsal interosseous nerve.
- Subjects were divided into proximal (<60°) and distal (>60°) trajectory groups based on suture button angle.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in thumb range of motion or trapeziectomy space height were observed between groups.
- The proximal trajectory group showed a significantly greater distance between the device and the nerve, though both groups maintained safe distances (>1 cm).
Conclusions:
- Both proximal and distal suture-button trajectories are safe and yield comparable thumb range of motion after trapeziectomy.
- Device placement in either trajectory offers similar functional and safety outcomes.
