Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Cranioselectivity of sumatriptan revisited: pronounced contractions to sumatriptan in small human isolated coronary
Kayi Y Chan1, Sieneke Labruijere, Martha B Ramírez Rosas
1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology, Erasmus Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Initial concerns about the coronary side-effect potential of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan and second-generation triptans initiated cranioselectivity studies using proximal human coronary arteries. However, myocardial ischaemia may originate from both large and small human coronary arteries.
Methods:
We investigated the contractions to sumatriptan in proximal (internal diameter 2-3 mm), distal (internal diameter 1,000-1,500 μm) and small (internal diameter 500-1,000 μm) human epicardial coronary arteries and compared these with contractions in the human middle meningeal artery. Concentration response curves to sumatriptan in human coronary arteries were constructed in the absence or presence of the 5-hydroxytryptamine1B (5-HT1B) receptor antagonist SB224289 and the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572. The effect of sumatriptan on increased cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels induced by forskolin in proximal and distal coronary artery segments was investigated using a biochemical assay. Western blotting was used to analyse the 5-HT1B receptor density in the human arteries.
Results:
Contractions in the proximal human coronary artery were significantly smaller than those in the human meningeal artery, as we showed previously. In contrast, contractions to sumatriptan in distal and small human coronary arteries were not different from those in the human meningeal artery. The 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289, but not the 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572, inhibited the contraction induced by sumatriptan in the coronary arteries. Moreover, in distal, but not in proximal, coronary arteries, sumatriptan inhibited the increase in cAMP levels induced by forskolin. Contrary to our expectations, the 5-HT1B receptor expression was more pronounced in the proximal human coronary artery than in the distal and small human coronary artery.
Conclusions:
Based on functional experiments in distal and small human coronary arteries, contractions to sumatriptan are not as cranioselective as previously assumed. However, the vast clinical experience with sumatriptan and other triptans has proven that these drugs are cardiovascularly safe when contraindications are taken into account.
More Related Videos
05:58Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
07:42Contractions of Human-iPSC-derived Cardiomyocyte Syncytia Measured with a Ca-sensitive Fluorescent Dye in Temperature-controlled 384-well Plates
Published on: October 18, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow....
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity