Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

08:07
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
Published on: January 11, 2018
8.0K
Deflections in Mandibular Major Connectors: A FEM Study
K S Satheesh Kumar1, S K Preeti1, R Savadi1
1Department of Prosthodontics, The Oxford Dental College, Hospital & Research Institute, Bommanahalli, Hosur Road, Bangalore, 560068 India.
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
|January 17, 2014
Summary
The study found that lingual plates offer greater rigidity than lingual bars for major connectors in removable partial dentures. Lingual plates in Class IV situations and lingual bars in Class III situations showed the least deflection under occlusal load.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Prosthetics
- Mechanical Engineering
Background:
- Major connectors are crucial in removable partial dentures, requiring rigidity to withstand occlusal forces and prevent damage to abutment teeth.
- Lingual bars and lingual plates are common mandibular major connectors, each with distinct biomechanical properties.
- Understanding connector deflection is vital for optimizing denture design and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare the deflection of different mandibular major connector designs under occlusal load using finite element analysis.
- To evaluate the biomechanical performance of lingual bars versus lingual plates across various Kennedy classifications (I-IV).
Main Methods:
- Finite element analysis (FEA) was employed to model and analyze six framework designs with lingual bars and lingual plates for Kennedy's Class I-IV situations.
- Three-dimensional models of human edentulous mandibles were created from CT scans.
- A vertical biting force of 20N was applied to simulate occlusal loading.
Main Results:
- Maximum deflection occurred in the saddle area, followed by the major connector and occlusal rest regions.
- Lingual plates demonstrated greater rigidity (less deflection) compared to lingual bars.
- In Kennedy's Class III situations, lingual bars showed the least deflection, while in Class IV, lingual plates exhibited the least deflection.
Conclusions:
- Lingual plates are generally more rigid than lingual bars, offering superior resistance to deformation.
- The choice of major connector design should consider the specific Kennedy classification to minimize deflection and ensure functional stability.
- FEA is a valuable tool for evaluating the biomechanical behavior of dental prostheses components.

