Motivational interviewing as a smoking cessation strategy with nurses: an exploratory randomised controlled trial
Agurtzane Mujika1, Angus Forbes2, Navidad Canga1
1School of Nursing, University of Navarra, Spain.
International Journal of Nursing Studies
|January 18, 2014
Summary
Motivational interviewing significantly increased smoking cessation rates among nurses. This smoking cessation intervention was found to be effective, acceptable, and feasible for healthcare professionals.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Professionals
- Public Health
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- High smoking prevalence exists among nurses, impacting their role in tobacco use reduction.
- Addressing smoking habits in healthcare professionals is crucial for public health initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy, acceptability, and feasibility of a motivational interviewing (MI) based smoking cessation intervention tailored for nurses.
- To determine if MI can effectively support nurses in quitting smoking.
Main Methods:
- A parallel experimental design with random allocation was employed.
- Thirty nurses who smoked were randomized into an MI intervention group (n=15) or a usual care control group (n=15).
- The MI intervention involved four individual sessions; usual care included brief advice. Efficacy was assessed via biochemically verified cessation, cigarette consumption, stages of change, self-efficacy, and depression. Acceptability and feasibility were measured by participant satisfaction, adherence, and session duration. Data were collected at baseline, end of intervention, and 3-month follow-up.
Main Results:
- At 3-month follow-up, the MI group showed a significantly higher smoking cessation rate (absolute difference 33.3%) compared to the control group.
- While no significant difference in daily cigarette consumption was observed among non-quitters, the MI group demonstrated greater progress in stages of change.
- The intervention was well-received, with high participant satisfaction, attendance, and completion rates, indicating good acceptability and feasibility.
Conclusions:
- Motivational interviewing demonstrates a beneficial effect on smoking cessation rates among nurses.
- The MI intervention is acceptable and feasible for nurses, with identified areas for optimization in larger-scale implementations.
- Utilizing motivational interviewing presents a novel and promising approach to address smoking among health professionals.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
3.3K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
3.9K
Nursing interventions are chosen as part of the planning process to achieve patient outcomes. Once nursing diagnoses are determined, the goals and outcomes are specified, then the nursing interventions are selected and individualized according to the patient's situation.
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
3.9K
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-V: Nursing Management
5.4K
Nursing management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is crucial for providing thorough care and support to patients. Nurses play an integral role in this process through detailed assessment, careful planning, targeted interventions, and ongoing evaluation. Here's an overview of the critical steps in nursing management for COPD.
Assessment
Assessment
5.4K
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
1.3K
Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
1.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Nursing Evaluation
4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K

