Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Use of Rasch analysis to refine a patient-reported questionnaire on satisfaction with communication of the multiple
A Solari1, M Grzeda2, A Giordano3
1Unit of Neuroepidemiology, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Italy solari@istituto-besta.it.
Background:
The Comunicazione medico-paziente nella Sclerosi Multipla - Revised (COSM-R) is a patient self-assessed questionnaire probing the moment of multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis disclosure (section 1, five items) and following period (section 2, 15 items).
Objectives:
This study examined COSM-R dimensionality and measurement properties through Rasch analysis (partial-credit model) and proposed a revised questionnaire.
Methods:
Cross-sectional COSM-R data were obtained from 1068 people with MS (PwMS, 1065 questionnaires) participating in four studies (102 centres). Mean age was 40 years (range 17-73); 70% were women; 53% were from Northern, 25% from Central, and 21% from Southern Italy.
Results:
Unidimensionality was not confirmed for COSM-R section 1, but was for section 2 after removal of three items. The revised instrument (COSM-S, Shortened) consisted of the original five-item checklist (section 1), modified by removing the table grouping of three items, and 12 of the original 15 section 2 items, which could now be summed and transformed into an interval scale. Scores were higher for items assessing emotional satisfaction than for those assessing informational satisfaction.
Conclusions:
The proposed COSM-S is a composite measure of satisfaction with MS diagnosis communication with improved metric properties over the original COSM-R, and whose section 2 satisfies Rasch model expectations.
Insights
A revised questionnaire, COSM-S, improves patient satisfaction assessment after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis communication. It offers better measurement properties than the original COSM-R, with section 2 meeting Rasch model expectations.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Psychometrics
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- The Comunicazione medico-paziente nella Sclerosi Multipla - Revised (COSM-R) questionnaire assesses patient satisfaction with communication following a multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis.
- It comprises two sections: diagnosis disclosure (5 items) and the subsequent period (15 items).
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the dimensionality and measurement properties of the COSM-R questionnaire using Rasch analysis.
- To propose a revised, more psychometrically sound questionnaire for assessing patient satisfaction with MS diagnosis communication.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional data from 1068 people with MS (PwMS) across 102 centers were analyzed using Rasch analysis (partial-credit model).
- The COSM-R underwent evaluation for unidimensionality, and items were assessed for removal or modification to improve measurement properties.
Main Results:
- The COSM-R section 1 was not found to be unidimensional.
- Section 2 demonstrated unidimensionality after the removal of three items, leading to the development of the revised COSM-S (Shortened) questionnaire.
- The COSM-S includes the original 5-item checklist and 12 items from section 2, allowing for summed scores on an interval scale.
- Patients reported higher emotional satisfaction than informational satisfaction.
Conclusions:
- The proposed COSM-S is a composite measure with improved metric properties compared to the COSM-R.
- Section 2 of the COSM-S satisfies Rasch model expectations, providing a reliable tool for assessing satisfaction with MS diagnosis communication.
Related Concept Videos
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...

