Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Naturalistic driving data can identify elevated driving risk in adults with Type 1 diabetes.

Traffic injury prevention·2026
Same author

Molecular mechanisms of naturally encoded signaling bias at the complement anaphylatoxin receptors.

Molecular cell·2026
Same author

Asking AI About Your Car: AI-Augmented Vehicle Owner's Manuals Support Integrated System Understanding Beyond Traditional Documentation.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Classifying Cognitive Decline in Older Drivers from Behavior on Adverse Roads Detected Using Computer Vision.

Journal of transportation technologies·2026
Same author

Pneumococcal Infective Endocarditis in two vaccinated Irish children; The Challenge of Non-Vaccine Serotypes and the Role of Host Immunity.

Irish journal of medical science·2026
Same author

Counting Zs: Determining the Monitoring Days Needed to Obtain Reliable Sleep Metrics in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Behavioral sleep medicine·2026
Same journal

A novel paradigm for identifying eye-tracking metrics associated with cognitive control during driving through MEG neuroimaging.

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2025
Same journal

Predicting Young Drivers' Time-to-Licensure from Sociodemographic Characteristics and Quality of Adult-Supervised Practice.

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2025
Same journal

Differential Impacts of Road Diets on Driving Behavior among Older Adults with and without Preclinical Alzheimer's Pathology.

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2025
Same journal

Examination of Naturalistic Driving Behavior and Risk Events Across Concussion Recovery.

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2025
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Driving fatigue increases after the spring transition to daylight saving time in young male drivers: A pilot study" [Transport. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 99 (2023) 83-97].

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2024
Same journal

Principal Components Analysis of Driving Simulator Variables in Novice Drivers.

Transportation research. Part F, Traffic psychology and behaviour·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

3.4K

Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Michelle L Rusch1, Mark C Schall2, Patrick Gavin3

  • 1University of Iowa College of Medicine, Department of Neurology Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering 200 Hawkins Drive Iowa City, IA 52242.

Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
|January 18, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Augmented reality (AR) cues in driving simulators improved hazard detection for pedestrians and signs without negatively impacting experienced drivers. AR did not impair perception of other objects, even for those with lower attention capacity.

Keywords:
Augmented RealityDriver DistractionDriver InattentionDrivingHighlighting Cues

More Related Videos

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.0K
Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

858

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
06:18

Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model

Published on: May 24, 2024

3.4K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

7.0K
Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality
06:54

Photorealistic Learned Landscapes for Augmented Reality

Published on: June 27, 2025

858

Area of Science:

  • Human-computer interaction
  • Traffic safety research
  • Cognitive psychology in driving

Background:

  • Experienced drivers face challenges in detecting roadside hazards.
  • Augmented reality (AR) offers potential for enhancing driver awareness.
  • Directing driver attention is crucial for preventing accidents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of AR cues in directing experienced drivers' attention to roadside hazards.
  • To assess the impact of AR cues on response time, detection accuracy, and headway.
  • To determine if AR cues interfere with the perception of non-target objects.

Main Methods:

  • A driving simulator study involving 27 experienced drivers over a 54-mile route.
  • AR cues were presented to highlight potential roadside hazards in rural segments.
  • Driver performance metrics included response time, detection accuracy, and headway.

Main Results:

  • AR cues did not negatively affect the perception of non-target objects.
  • Drivers with lower attentional capacity were not impaired by AR cues.
  • AR cueing showed a near-significant benefit in response time for detected hazards.
  • Detection rates for pedestrians and warning signs improved with AR cueing.

Conclusions:

  • AR cues can effectively direct driver attention to specific roadside hazards.
  • AR technology shows promise for improving road safety without cognitive overload.
  • Further research can explore AR's role in diverse driving conditions and hazard types.