Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bone health in asthma: a twofold effect of disease and pharmacotherapy.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

From Intention to Action: A Grounded Theory Study on the Staged Mechanisms of Postoperative Exercise Behavior Among Breast Cancer Patients.

Patient preference and adherence·2026
Same author

Ultrafast Ionic Cross-Phase Transport in Nanofluidics for Simultaneously Boosting Osmotic Energy Conversion and Lithium Recovery.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2026
Same author

Integrated CT-derived fractional flow reserve and perivascular fat attenuation index: a multimodal approach to predict in-stent restenosis.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine·2025
Same author

Reliability and reproducibility of CBCT assessment of craniomaxillary changes before and after treatment for Class III growing patients - a cautious or critical approach.

BMC pediatrics·2025
Same author

Impact of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the robustness of abdominal computed tomography radiomics features using standard and low radiation doses.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

14.8K

[Mini-implant stability analysis at different healing times before loading].

Lihua Shan1, Guanjun Zhou1, Xingchao Li2

  • 1Dept. of Orthodontics, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.

Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi = Huaxi Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi = West China Journal of Stomatology
|January 21, 2014
PubMed
Summary

A 3-week healing period after mini-implant insertion poses a risk to stability, with lower removal torque. Loading implants immediately or after 1 week, and especially at 8 weeks, enhances stability and bone remodeling.

More Related Videos

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
07:09

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint

Published on: March 7, 2014

12.5K
A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
11:51

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage

Published on: February 10, 2014

14.8K
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
07:09

In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint

Published on: March 7, 2014

12.5K
A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
06:41

A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions

Published on: March 22, 2018

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontic biomechanics
  • Dental implantology
  • Bone healing and osseointegration

Background:

  • Mini-implants are crucial for orthodontic anchorage.
  • Understanding optimal healing times before loading is essential for implant success.
  • Biomechanical stability is key to preventing implant failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To biomechanically evaluate mini-implant stability at various healing intervals before orthodontic loading.
  • To determine the effect of different healing periods on the interfacial shear strength of mini-implants.
  • To analyze bone quality and implant surface characteristics after healing.

Main Methods:

  • Sixty-four mini-implants were placed in beagle dogs and subjected to different healing periods (0, 1, 3, 8 weeks) before loading.
  • Maximum removal torque (MRT) testing was conducted to assess interfacial shear strength.
  • Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for surface analysis of retrieved implants.

Main Results:

  • The 3-week healing group exhibited significantly lower removal torque values compared to other groups (P < 0.05).
  • SEM analysis revealed more fibrous bone around 3-week implants, while other groups showed lamellar-like bone tissue.
  • Implants loaded after 8 weeks of healing demonstrated enhanced peri-implant bone remodeling and stability.

Conclusions:

  • A 3-week healing period represents a critical, potentially unstable phase for mini-implants.
  • Early loading (immediately or 1 week) or delayed loading at 8 weeks influences implant stability.
  • Optimal healing time, particularly 8 weeks, positively impacts bone remodeling and long-term implant stability.