Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intraarterial mitomycin-C for recurrent brain metastases.

D J Stewart1, Z Grahovac, H Hugenholtz

  • 1Ontario Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation, Ottawa, Canada.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology
|October 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

Intraarterial mitomycin-C shows promise for recurrent brain metastases after cranial irradiation. This treatment offers a 46% response rate with manageable toxicity, providing a viable option for patients who have exhausted standard therapies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term Toxicity and Health-related Quality of Life after Single-fraction High Dose Rate Brachytherapy Boost and Hypofractionated External Beam Radiotherapy for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2017
Same author

Does the Time of Radiotherapy Affect Treatment Outcomes? A Review of the Literature.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2016
Same author

Ondansetron rapidly dissolving film for the prophylactic treatment of radiation-induced nausea and vomiting-a pilot study.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2015
Same author

Aprepitant and granisetron for the prophylaxis of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic radiotherapy for bone metastases: a prospective pilot study.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2014
Same author

Patterns of practice in the prescription of palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of bone metastases at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program between 2005 and 2012.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2013
Same author

Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: a review of 2008-2012.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)·2013

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Medical Oncology
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Brain metastases are a common complication of systemic cancers.
  • Recurrent brain metastases after cranial irradiation present a significant treatment challenge.
  • Limited effective therapeutic options exist for patients with progressive disease post-irradiation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraarterial mitomycin-C for patients with recurrent brain metastases.
  • To determine response rates, duration of response, and overall survival.
  • To assess treatment-related toxicity and identify dose-limiting factors.

Main Methods:

  • Fifteen patients with recurrent brain metastases received intraarterial mitomycin-C (15 mg/m2) via transfemoral catheter.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Treatment was administered in 100 ml 0.45% saline over 20 minutes with an in-line filter.
  • Patient response was assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans and neurological evaluations.
  • Main Results:

    • Six out of 13 evaluable patients (46%) demonstrated a response, evidenced by both CT scan and neurological improvement.
    • Median duration of response was 25 weeks.
    • Median survival for all 15 patients was 17 weeks, with dose-limiting toxicities including neurological, ocular, and local skin effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Intraarterial mitomycin-C is an effective and reasonably well-tolerated regimen for recurrent brain metastases post-cranial irradiation.
    • Toxicity appears comparable to other intra-arterial regimens and potentially less toxic via vertebral artery infusion.
    • This treatment is not recommended as first-line therapy but serves as a valuable option for refractory disease.