Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

14.5K

Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.

Nicolas Chenouard1, Ihor Smal2, Fabrice de Chaumont3

  • 11] Institut Pasteur, Unité d'Analyse d'Images Quantitative, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité de Recherche Associée 2582, Paris, France. [2] Biomedical Imaging Group, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. [3] New York University Neuroscience Institute, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. [4].

Nature Methods
|January 21, 2014
PubMed

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ensembling Unets for Rare Chromosomal Aberration Detection in Metaphase Images, Uncertainty Quantification, and Ionizing Radiation Dose Estimation.

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology·2026
Same author

Multimodal animal health monitoring in extensive livestock production systems.

Frontiers in veterinary science·2026
Same author

15-PGDH inhibition promotes muscle repair and strength recovery during GLP-1 receptor agonist-induced weight loss.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Cell segmentation in microscopy images using a SAM-based U-Net architecture and a novel dataset.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same author

OCT-based optic neuropathy diagnosis using explainable and privacy-preserving machine learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

15-PGDH Inhibition Overcomes Muscle Regenerative Deficit Seen With GLP1-Receptor Agonist-Induced Weight Loss.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

ClairS: a deep-learning method for long-read tumor-normal pair somatic small variant calling.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

3D pathology-guided microdissection.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Derivation of elephant induced pluripotent stem cells.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Automated particle tracking methods for microscopy images were compared in an open competition. No single method excelled in all scenarios, but results offer practical guidance for users and developers.

Area of Science:

  • Cell biology
  • Biophysics
  • Image analysis

Background:

  • Quantitative analysis of intracellular dynamics relies on particle tracking from time-lapse microscopy.
  • Manual particle tracking is infeasible for large datasets.
  • Automated computational methods are essential for analyzing intracellular processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To objectively compare the performance of various automated particle tracking methods.
  • To identify the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches across diverse scenarios.
  • To provide practical conclusions for researchers and software developers in the field.

Main Methods:

  • An open competition was organized with a common dataset.
  • Participating teams applied their independent automated particle tracking methods.

More Related Videos

Three-dimensional Particle Tracking Velocimetry for Turbulence Applications: Case of a Jet Flow
13:02

Three-dimensional Particle Tracking Velocimetry for Turbulence Applications: Case of a Jet Flow

Published on: February 27, 2016

12.1K
Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments
10:32

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments

Published on: July 20, 2017

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

14.5K
Three-dimensional Particle Tracking Velocimetry for Turbulence Applications: Case of a Jet Flow
13:02

Three-dimensional Particle Tracking Velocimetry for Turbulence Applications: Case of a Jet Flow

Published on: February 27, 2016

12.1K
Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments
10:32

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments

Published on: July 20, 2017

10.4K
  • Performance was assessed using standardized evaluation metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • No single particle tracking method demonstrated superior performance across all tested scenarios.
    • Significant performance differences were observed between the various automated methods.
    • The study highlighted the impact of different algorithmic approaches on tracking accuracy and robustness.

    Conclusions:

    • The comparison provides valuable insights into the practical applicability of different particle tracking algorithms.
    • Results guide users in selecting appropriate methods for their specific research needs.
    • Developers can leverage findings to improve existing and develop new particle tracking tools.