Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm
J Stuart Melvin1, Tharun Karthikeyan2, Robert Cope3
1OrthoCarolina, Concord, North Carolina.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|January 22, 2014
Summary
Early hip arthroplasty failures remain a concern, with 24.1% requiring revision within five years. Metallosis and aseptic loosening are now leading causes, highlighting the need for caution with new surgical innovations.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Early failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a significant clinical concern.
- Previous studies indicated high rates of early revisions due to instability and aseptic loosening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the trends and causes of early failures in revision hip arthroplasty.
- To compare early failure rates between different time periods and identify emerging failure modes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 1168 revision hip arthroplasties performed between 2001 and 2011.
- Analysis of failure modes occurring within 5 years of the index total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Comparison with historical data from 1986 to 2000.
Main Results:
- 24.1% of THAs underwent revision within 5 years of the index procedure.
- Common failure modes included aseptic loosening, infection, instability, metallosis, and fracture.
- The proportion of early revisions decreased by 9% compared to the previous study period (1986-2000).
- Metallosis and aseptic loosening of metal-on-metal shells emerged as leading causes of early failure.
Conclusions:
- Despite a decrease in the proportion of early revisions, the rate remains concerning.
- The rise of metallosis and aseptic loosening associated with metal-on-metal shells requires attention.
- Caution is advised regarding the rapid adoption of new surgical innovations without robust evidence-based medicine justification.


