Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

596
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
596
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

2.2K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
2.2K
Contingency Table01:29

Contingency Table

4.0K
A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
4.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.7K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.7K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

7.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
7.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immediate level change estimates can be biased when interrupted time series analyses aggregate over time using segmented linear regression.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

CRT-Estimands Framework: consensus based extension of the ICH E9(R1) addendum for cluster randomised trials.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Additional crossovers in cluster randomised crossover trials do not always increase statistical power.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Comparing meta-analysis and linear mixed model-based approaches for the analysis of continuous outcomes from batched stepped wedge trials.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same author

Repeated inclusion cluster randomized trials: a new class of designs for assessing group-level interventions.

Biometrics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

7.5K

Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.

Elizabeth J Williamson1, Zoe Aitken, Jock Lawrie

  • 1School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; The Victorian Centre for Biostatistics (VICBiostat), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)
|January 23, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) help identify confounding variables in respiratory health research when exposure randomization isn't possible. This method aids in selecting which factors to control for accurate effect estimation.

Keywords:
causal inferenceconfoundingdirected acyclic graphobservational study

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment
08:43

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

7.5K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Respiratory Health Research

Background:

  • Estimating exposure effects on health outcomes is crucial in respiratory research.
  • Confounding bias complicates effect estimation when exposure randomization is not feasible.
  • Controlling for measured confounders via statistical analysis (e.g., regression, stratification) is a common approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and illustrate a causal diagram approach for confounder selection.
  • To provide a systematic method for identifying variables that need statistical control to remove confounding.
  • To apply this approach to the research question of smoking's effect on asthma risk.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing causal diagrams (directed acyclic graphs) to visualize causal relationships between exposure, outcome, and confounders.
  • Applying a set of intuitive rules derived from causal inference principles to select confounders for control.
  • Performing statistical analysis on the Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study data based on confounder selection via the causal diagram approach.

Main Results:

  • The causal diagram approach provides a structured method for identifying necessary confounders.
  • Application to the smoking and asthma research question demonstrated the practical utility of the method.
  • Statistical analysis results, guided by the causal diagram, were obtained.

Conclusions:

  • Causal diagrams offer a robust framework for confounder selection in observational respiratory health studies.
  • This approach enhances the validity of effect estimates by ensuring appropriate control for confounding bias.
  • The method is applicable to various research questions involving exposure-outcome relationships.