Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

General Anesthesia: Overview01:24

General Anesthesia: Overview

1.1K
Anesthesia is a medical procedure that uses drugs for CNS suppression to enable painless surgeries and procedures. The selection of anesthetics is influenced by their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and patient characteristics. Various types of anesthesia include general, local, regional, spinal, and inhalational.
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
1.1K
Stages of General Anesthesia01:22

Stages of General Anesthesia

2.6K
Various sedation levels offer significant advantages in facilitating procedural interventions for patients undergoing medical or invasive surgical procedures. These levels span from anxiolysis to general anesthesia, providing a spectrum of sedative effects to cater to specific patient needs. Anxiolysis reduces anxiety and is achieved through minimal sedation, enabling patients to remain awake and responsive while feeling more at ease during the procedure. This level can benefit minor...
2.6K
Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects01:12

Local Anesthetics: Adverse Effects

1.0K
While local anesthetics are generally safe and well-tolerated, they can occasionally cause adverse effects that vary in severity. Local anesthetics can induce toxicity at two distinct levels. They can either produce local effects through direct contact with the neural elements or be absorbed into the bloodstream from the injection site, leading to systemic effects.
Once absorbed into the systemic circulation, local anesthetics can affect the organs that depend on the functioning of sodium...
1.0K
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview01:24

Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview

1.0K
Intravenous anesthetics are drugs administered parenterally to induce anesthesia or sedation. Propofol is a widely used agent formulated as a 1% emulsion in soybean oil, glycerol, and egg phosphatide. It induces rapid anesthesia primarily due to its rapid distribution from the bloodstream to target tissues and is metabolized in the liver. However, it can cause significant pain on injection and hypertriglyceridemia. Fospropofol, a water-based prodrug of propofol, lacks these adverse effects.
1.0K
Amnesia01:13

Amnesia

950
Amnesia is a condition marked by long-term memory loss, which impairs the ability to recall past events or create new memories.
The severity and duration of memory loss vary depending on the type and underlying cause. Amnesia is classified into two main types: retrograde and anterograde.
Retrograde amnesia is marked by the loss of memories formed before the onset of the condition. Patients may recall distant past events but often forget those occurring shortly before the incident.
Anterograde...
950
Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:30

Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

4.9K
Local anesthetics (LAs) are drugs that induce a temporary loss of sensation in a limited body area, preventing pain. Cocaine was the first local anesthetic discovered in the late 19th century. Cocaine is a benzoic acid ester obtained from the leaves of coca shrubs and was often used for its psychotropic effects. Cocaine was first isolated in 1860 by Albert Niemann. Sigmund Freud studied the physiological actions of cocaine. Carl Koller later introduced it into clinical practice in 1884 as a...
4.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethical and social aspects of neural prosthetics.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2025
Same author

Deep Brain Stimulation and Neuropsychiatric Anthropology - The "Prosthetisability" of the Lifeworld.

AJOB neuroscience·2024
Same author

How the websites of high-volume US centers address the risks of living kidney donation.

Clinical transplantation·2023
Same author

Reconsidering the Many Disorders of Consciousness.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2023
Same author

Biomarkers in Psychiatric Disorders.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2022
Same author

Mind-Brain Dualism in Psychiatry: Ethical Implications.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
14:52

Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers

Published on: January 13, 2018

10.9K

Anaesthesia, amnesia and harm.

Walter Glannon

    Journal of Medical Ethics
    |January 23, 2014
    PubMed
    Summary

    This article explores the ethical and clinical implications of patients experiencing awareness during general surgery. It examines the potential for psychological harm, the use of memory-altering drugs, and the complex decision-making process regarding patient communication and memory management.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical anesthesiology research within neuroscience
    • Bioethics and medical jurisprudence regarding anaesthesia awareness

    Background:

    No prior work has fully resolved the ethical complexities surrounding intraoperative consciousness during surgical procedures. It was already known that general sedation suppresses neural pathways responsible for arousal and memory formation. However, some individuals unexpectedly regain awareness while remaining paralyzed under clinical care. This gap motivated an investigation into the psychological consequences of such traumatic experiences. Prior research has shown that memory consolidation often fails during standard sedation protocols. That uncertainty drove a need to evaluate how clinicians should respond when awareness occurs. No consensus exists regarding the administration of pharmacological agents to modify or erase these memories. This analysis addresses the intersection of neurobiology and patient welfare in clinical settings.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this article is to examine the ethical and clinical implications of patients experiencing unintended awareness during general surgery. The study addresses the specific problem of how clinicians should manage traumatic memories formed during these events. It explores the neural underpinnings of consciousness to provide a foundation for understanding why awareness occurs despite sedation. The motivation for this work stems from the potential for severe psychological harm following such experiences. The author investigates whether practitioners are justified in using drugs to prevent or erase these memories. This research also evaluates the reasons for and against informing patients about the possibility of awareness before surgery. The study seeks to clarify the complex decision-making process involved in balancing patient welfare and medical intervention. By analyzing these factors, the work provides a framework for addressing the challenges posed by intraoperative consciousness.

    Keywords:
    Anaesthetics / AnesthesiologyAutonomyConsciousnessInformed ConsentSurgeryintraoperative consciousnesssedation ethicsmemory consolidationperioperative care

    Frequently Asked Questions

    More Related Videos

    Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
    08:49

    Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention

    Published on: October 16, 2013

    13.5K
    Optogenetic Activation of Afferent Pathways in Brain Slices and Modulation of Responses by Volatile Anesthetics
    08:16

    Optogenetic Activation of Afferent Pathways in Brain Slices and Modulation of Responses by Volatile Anesthetics

    Published on: July 23, 2020

    2.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 3, 2026

    Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers
    14:52

    Recording Brain Electromagnetic Activity During the Administration of the Gaseous Anesthetic Agents Xenon and Nitrous Oxide in Healthy Volunteers

    Published on: January 13, 2018

    10.9K
    Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention
    08:49

    Assessing Changes in Volatile General Anesthetic Sensitivity of Mice after Local or Systemic Pharmacological Intervention

    Published on: October 16, 2013

    13.5K
    Optogenetic Activation of Afferent Pathways in Brain Slices and Modulation of Responses by Volatile Anesthetics
    08:16

    Optogenetic Activation of Afferent Pathways in Brain Slices and Modulation of Responses by Volatile Anesthetics

    Published on: July 23, 2020

    2.1K

    Main Methods:

    The review approach involves a systematic examination of neurobiological foundations concerning consciousness and memory consolidation. The author synthesizes existing literature to identify the pathways disrupted by sedative agents during surgical interventions. This analysis evaluates ethical arguments regarding the disclosure of potential risks to patients before procedures. The investigation considers the clinical justification for using pharmacological interventions to modify traumatic recollections. The study design integrates philosophical inquiry with practical medical decision-making frameworks. The author reviews current standards for managing reports of consciousness during surgery to assess potential patient harm. This methodology focuses on the tension between preventing distress and the risks inherent in memory-altering drug administration. The inquiry provides a structured assessment of the ethical dilemmas faced by practitioners in perioperative environments.

    Main Results:

    Key findings from the literature indicate that unintended awareness during surgery leads to the formation of traumatic memories in some patients. The author identifies that sedation typically functions by suppressing arousal mechanisms and disrupting memory consolidation processes. The analysis reveals that clinicians face significant ethical challenges when awareness is detected intraoperatively or reported postoperatively. The review suggests that the potential harm of retaining traumatic memories must be weighed against the risks of drugs intended to erase them. The findings highlight that no universal consensus exists on whether to inform patients of awareness risks preoperatively. The literature indicates that the decision to administer memory-altering agents remains complex and highly dependent on individual patient circumstances. The synthesis demonstrates that both the benefits and risks of pharmacological memory erasure require careful clinical evaluation. The results underscore the necessity of balancing patient welfare with the limitations of current anesthetic practices.

    Conclusions:

    The author synthesizes evidence regarding the potential psychological trauma resulting from unintended intraoperative awareness. Clinical decisions regarding memory-altering drugs require balancing potential harm against the risks of pharmacological intervention. The text suggests that clinicians must weigh the benefits of erasing traumatic recollections against the value of retaining patient memory. Ethical considerations regarding preoperative disclosure remain a subject of ongoing debate within the medical community. The analysis highlights the necessity of evaluating both the negative impact of awareness and the safety profile of memory-suppressing agents. Synthesis of these factors informs the complex choices faced by practitioners when managing patient reports of consciousness. The discussion underscores the tension between preventing psychological distress and respecting the integrity of patient experience. Future clinical practice depends on integrating these ethical frameworks into standard perioperative care protocols.

    The author proposes that awareness occurs when sedation fails to suppress neural mechanisms mediating arousal and memory consolidation. This leads to traumatic recollections, which differ from standard unconsciousness where memory formation is typically disrupted by pharmacological agents.

    The researcher evaluates the use of pharmacological agents intended to erase traumatic memories. This differs from standard anesthetic drugs, which are designed to induce unconsciousness or amnesia rather than selectively targeting existing memory traces post-experience.

    The author suggests that preoperative disclosure is necessary to respect patient autonomy. This contrasts with the clinical concern that informing patients might increase anxiety, potentially complicating the induction of anesthesia or the overall surgical experience.

    The analysis utilizes clinical reports of awareness to assess patient harm. This data type allows for a comparison between the psychological distress of retaining traumatic memories and the potential risks associated with administering memory-erasing drugs.

    The author examines the phenomenon of intraoperative consciousness where patients remain paralyzed but aware. This measurement of awareness is compared against the standard state of unconsciousness, where patients are typically unable to form memories of the surgical event.

    The researcher proposes that clinicians must carefully weigh the potential benefits of memory erasure against the risks of such drugs. This implies that the decision to treat should be individualized rather than following a universal protocol for all patients.