R2 and R2* are equally effective in evaluating chronic response to iron chelation

MRI relaxometry (R2, R2*) has generally replaced liver biopsy for estimation of liver iron stores in response to iron chelation, but there have been no longitudinal studies comparing R2 and R2* techniques. We use R2 and R2* liver iron concentration (LIC) estimates, transfusional iron burdens, and drug compliance data to calculate iron chelation efficiency (ICE) in patients undergoing a Phase II trial of SPD602. Fifty-one patients underwent a baseline examination, 39 patients completed 1 year, and 26 patients completed 2 years. Baseline LICR2 and LICR2* estimates were unbiased, but had limits of agreement exceeding 50%, suggesting that these techniques cannot be interchanged with one another in the same patient. However, ICE estimates across the two techniques compared more favorably, with r(2) values reaching 0.89 at 2 years. 95 confidence intervals for efficiency estimates were 0.0 ± 4.1%. These data indicate that clinical trial and clinical effectiveness data calculated using LICR2 and LICR2* estimates can be compared to one another, even though LIC estimates may be disparate on cross-sectional analysis. While the choice of MRI assessment technique for clinical trials and for clinical management depends on many logistical considerations, one can have confidence comparing conclusions on clinical effectiveness.