Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Gynecologic Cancer
Published on: April 17, 2012
Conventional four field radiotherapy versus computed tomography-based treatment planning in cancer cervix: A
Abhishek Gulia1, Firuza Patel1, Bhavana Rai1
1Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Background:
With advancements in imaging, wide variations in pelvic anatomy have been observed, thus raising doubts about adequate target volume coverage by conventional external radiotherapy fields based on bony landmarks. The present study evaluates the need for integrating computed tomography (CT)-based planning in the treatment of carcinoma cervix.
Aims:
To estimate inadequacies in target volume coverage when using conventional planning based on bony landmarks.
Materials And Methods:
The study consisted of 50 patients. Target volume delineation was done on planning CT scans, according to the guidelines given in literature. The volume of target receiving 95% of prescribed dose (V95) was calculated after superimposing a conventional four field box on digitally reconstructed radiograph. The geographic miss with conventional four field box technique was compared with the CT-based target volume delineation.
Results:
In 48 out of 50 patients, the conventional four field box failed to encompass the target volume. The areas of miss were at the superior and lateral borders of the anterior-posterior fields, and the anterior border of the lateral fields. The median V95 for conventional fields marked with bony landmarks was only 89.4% as compared to 93% for target delineation based on CT contouring.
Conclusions:
Our study shows inadequate target volume coverage with conventional four field box technique. We recommend routine use of CT-based planning for treatment with radiotherapy in carcinoma cervix.
