The reliability of routine clinical post-processing software in assessing potential diffusion-weighted MRI

R Zakaria1, K Das2, M Bhojak2

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK; Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Abstract

Insights

Diffusion MRI metrics show promise as non-invasive biomarkers for brain metastases. Different measurement methods and software platforms yield reliable results, correlating with survival and tumor type.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Oncology
  • Biomarker Discovery

Background:

  • Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is crucial for assessing brain metastases prognosis.
  • Standardized ADC measurement protocols are lacking, impacting clinical utility.
  • Variability in ROI placement and software affects reproducibility.

Observation:

  • 12 patients with brain metastases underwent preoperative DWI.
  • Three post-processing platforms were evaluated.
  • ROIs were placed on tumors, peritumoral areas, and the brain-tumor interface by experts.
  • Inter- and intra-observer variability was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

Findings:

  • Excellent correlation observed across software platforms for various ADC measures.
  • No significant inter- or intra-observer variability in repeated measurements.
  • Significant differences in mean ADC values obtained with different methodologies.
  • ADC metrics showed differential relationships with overall survival and primary tumor type.

Implications:

  • dMRI metrics are reliable, reproducible biomarkers for brain metastases.
  • Standardized dMRI analysis can enhance prognostic accuracy.
  • Further research can refine dMRI for personalized treatment strategies.