Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

10:36
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
14.6K
Correction of sequence-dependent ambiguous bases (Ns) from the 454 pyrosequencing system
1School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and WCU Center for Green Metagenomics, Yonsei University, Shinchon-dong 134, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nucleic Acids Research
|January 28, 2014
Summary
Ambiguous bases (Ns) in pyrosequencing are sequence-dependent, not random errors. A new algorithm corrects these Ns, improving microbial diversity analysis accuracy and reducing taxonomic bias.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Bioinformatics
- Genomics
Background:
- 16S ribosomal RNA (16S) gene pyrosequencing is a key method for microbial diversity assessment.
- Pyrosequencing reads with ambiguous bases (Ns) are typically discarded, potentially introducing bias.
- Previous assumptions suggested Ns arise from non-sequence-dependent, high error rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if Ns in pyrosequencing reads occur in a sequence-dependent manner.
- To develop and validate a method for correcting sequence-dependent N errors.
- To assess the impact of N correction on microbial community analysis and genome sequencing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of pyrosequencing reads and flow value data to identify N error patterns.
- Development of an algorithm to correct Ns based on identified sequence-specific patterns.
- Application of the N correction algorithm to 16S, bphD, and nifH amplicon reads from mock and soil communities, and metagenome data.
Main Results:
- Pyrosequencing N errors exhibit a sequence-dependent pattern, often following homopolymers.
- The developed algorithm corrected a high percentage of Ns in amplicon reads (16S: 86.54%, bphD: 81.37%, nifH: 81.55%) with high precision.
- N correction reduced taxonomic biases in amplicon and shotgun sequencing data, improving accuracy.
Conclusions:
- Ns in pyrosequencing are not random but follow predictable, sequence-dependent patterns.
- A novel algorithm effectively corrects these Ns, enhancing the precision of microbial community analysis.
- This method improves the accuracy of 16S rRNA gene sequencing and broader genomic applications using pyrosequencing data.
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
87.9K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
87.9K
Sanger Sequencing
800.8K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
800.8K
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
10.5K
In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
10.5K
Mismatch Repair
5.4K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
5.4K
Mismatch Repair
38.1K
Overview
38.1K
Proofreading
7.6K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore, it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
7.6K

