Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The somatosensory central conduction time: physiological considerations and normative data.

D Zegers de Beyl1, X Delberghe, A G Herbaut

  • 1Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Central conduction time (CCT) measurement methods were compared in healthy individuals. Mean peak CCT was shorter than mean onset CCT, with reproducible results across sessions.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Depression, anxiety and non-motor symptoms on initiation of intrajejunal levodopa/carbidopa therapy.

Acta neurologica Belgica·2015
Same author

Multiple myeloma presenting with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: causal or chance link?

Neurology·2007
Same author

Effects of levodopa on upper limb mobility and gait in Parkinson's disease.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2003
Same author

[The neurology department].

Revue medicale de Bruxelles·2003
Same author

Painful arm and moving fingers: clinical features of four new cases.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2002
Same author

[Susac syndrome in a man].

Revue neurologique·2002

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Somatosensory System

Background:

  • Somatosensory central conduction time (CCT) is a key electrophysiological measure.
  • CCT can be determined using peak-to-peak (N13-N20) or onset-to-onset (N11-N20) intervals.
  • Understanding CCT measurement variations is crucial for accurate clinical interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare peak CCT and onset CCT measurements.
  • To evaluate the impact of different reference electrodes on CCT parameters.
  • To assess the reproducibility and physiological correlates of CCT intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous measurement of onset and peak CCT in 40 normal subjects.
  • Utilized various reference electrodes including linked earlobes, F3, ipsilateral parietal scalp, and non-cephalic.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed N11-P14 and P14-N20 intervals derived from onset CCT to assess spinal and supraspinal conduction.

    • Main Results:

    • Mean peak CCT was significantly shorter than mean onset CCT.
    • N11 onset, N20 onset, and CCT intervals showed no significant latency changes with different reference electrodes.
    • N13 and N20 peak latencies varied significantly with different electrode montages.
    • CCT parameters (onset and peak) and derived intervals (N11-P14, P14-N20) were reproducible over one year and not correlated with age or height.

    Conclusions:

    • Onset and peak CCT represent distinct physiological parameters.
    • Onset CCT and its derived intervals offer reproducible measures of spinal and supraspinal conduction.
    • Peak CCT is a shorter and distinct measure compared to onset CCT.