Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
The effect of response scale, administration mode, and format on responses to the CAHPS Clinician and Group survey
Keith M Drake1, J Lee Hargraves, Stephanie Lloyd
1Health Care division of Greylock McKinnon Associates, Cambridge, MA.
Objective:
To examine how different response scales, methods of survey administration, and survey format affect responses to the CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Study Design:
A total of 6,500 patients from a university health center were randomly assigned to receive the following: standard 12-page mail surveys using 4-category or 6-category response scales (on CG-CAHPS composite items), telephone surveys using 4-category or 6-category response scales, or four-page mail surveys.
Principal Findings:
A total of 3,538 patients completed surveys. Composite score means and provider-level reliabilities did not differ between respondents receiving 4-category or 6-category response scale surveys or between 12-page and four-page mail surveys. Telephone respondents gave more positive responses than mail respondents.
Conclusions:
We recommend using 4-category response scales and the four-page mail CG-CAHPS survey.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Data Collection by Survey
Ordinal Level of Measurement
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks...
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Group Design
