Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)01:27

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

669
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...
669
Classification of Illness01:17

Classification of Illness

8.4K
The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
8.4K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II01:25

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II

3.5K
Nursing diagnoses represent a problem validated by major defining characteristics. There are four categories of nursing diagnoses: problem-focused, risk, health promotion or wellness, and syndrome. The anatomy of a nursing diagnosis includes three components: problem statement or diagnostic label, defining characteristics, and related factors.
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
3.5K
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I01:26

Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I

3.4K
A nursing diagnosis is written when the nurse recognizes a cluster of essential patient data indicating health problems treated with independent nursing interventions. The standardized terminologies of a nursing diagnosis help nurses identify and treat patients' problems. Every electronic health record that uses nursing diagnosis must employ standard diagnostic terminology. Developing an efficient, individualized care plan begins with accurate nursing diagnoses.
There are thirteen domains...
3.4K
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.6K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.6K
Multicompartment Models: Overview01:14

Multicompartment Models: Overview

416
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
416

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconceptualizing Scoring Reliability Through Linguistic Similarity.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Modeling Item Revisit Behavior: The Hierarchical Speed-Accuracy-Revisits Model.

Educational and psychological measurement·2023
Same author

A Robust Method for Detecting Item Misfit in Large-Scale Assessments.

Educational and psychological measurement·2023
Same author

Scoring Graphical Responses in TIMSS 2019 Using Artificial Neural Networks.

Educational and psychological measurement·2023
Same author

Erratum to: A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.

Psychometrika·2022
Same author

A Response-Time-Based Latent Response Mixture Model for Identifying and Modeling Careless and Insufficient Effort Responding in Survey Data.

Psychometrika·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 14, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K

Hierarchical diagnostic classification models morphing into unidimensional 'diagnostic' classification models-a

Matthias von Davier1, Shelby J Haberman

  • 1Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, USA, mvondavier@ets.org.

Psychometrika
|January 31, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This commentary examines cognitive diagnostic models, questioning assumptions about attribute hierarchies and interactions. It provides examples and references for understanding these complex models in psychometrics.

More Related Videos

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 14, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.8K
Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.2K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.8K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Cognitive Psychology

Background:

  • Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are increasingly used for assessing skills and knowledge.
  • Templin and Bradshaw's 2013 paper proposed hierarchical diagnostic classification models.
  • These models assume specific structures for attribute relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the modeling approaches and terminology in Templin and Bradshaw's work.
  • To discuss the implications of assuming attribute hierarchies and interactions in CDMs.
  • To highlight potential issues and offer avenues for further research in diagnostic classification.

Main Methods:

  • A critical commentary and analysis of existing literature.
  • Examination of the assumptions underlying hierarchical diagnostic classification models.
  • Illustration of conceptual issues with concrete examples.

Main Results:

  • Identified several concerns regarding the application of CDMs with pre-defined attribute hierarchies.
  • Highlighted the potential limitations when assuming specific attribute interaction forms.
  • Provided a framework for discussing the validity and interpretation of such models.

Conclusions:

  • The commentary underscores the importance of carefully considering model assumptions in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
  • Researchers should be mindful of the implications of hierarchical structures and attribute interactions.
  • Further research is needed to refine CDMs and their application in educational and psychological measurement.