Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...

Motor Unit Stimulation

Motor Unit Stimulation

When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Integrated behavioral and biological assessment reveals 5-HT3 receptor-independent nausea/malaise-like responses in cisplatin-treated mice.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2026

Same author

Delayed response of the median raphe serotonin neurons projecting to the ventral hippocampus to aversive stimuli.

Journal of pharmacological sciences·2026

Same author

Age differences in electrocortical dynamics during uneven terrain walking.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Same author

Development and validation of a kinematic hindlimb cycling model for rats.

Scientific reports·2025

Same author

Age differences in electrocortical dynamics during uneven terrain walking.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

Discovery of ORIC-533, an Orally Bioavailable CD73 Inhibitor That Maintains Activity in High AMP Environments to Reverse Tumor Immunosuppression.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2025

Same journal

Join AANEM.

Muscle & nerve·2026

Same journal

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Management and Prevention of Symptomatic Neuroma.

Muscle & nerve·2026

Same journal

AANEM News & Insights.

Muscle & nerve·2026

Same journal

Fat-Fraction Quantification Using Three-Point Dixon Technique in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Its Correlation With Clinical Progression and Genotypic Characteristics: A Single Centre One-Year Prospective Study.

Muscle & nerve·2026

Same journal

Characterizing Combined Central and Peripheral Demyelination-Insights From a Multimodal Comparison With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy and Multiple Sclerosis.

Muscle & nerve·2026

Same journal

Electrical Modalities in the Rehabilitation of Peripheral Nerve Injuries: State of the Literature and Current Clinical Applications.

Muscle & nerve·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between In Vivo and Ex Vivo Studies with the "Avatar" Technique to Advance Muscle Mechanics Research

Published on: August 18, 2023

Comparing the force ripple during asynchronous and conventional stimulation.

Ryan J Downey¹, Mark Tate, Hiroyuki Kawai

¹Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611-6250, USA.

|February 1, 2014

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Asynchronous electrical stimulation can reduce muscle fatigue but may cause force ripple. Lower frequencies (8-12 Hz) induced significant ripple, while 16 Hz asynchronous stimulation produced smooth contractions comparable to voluntary ones.

Keywords:

asynchronous stimulation force ripple functional electrical stimulation muscle fatigue neuromuscular electrical stimulation torque ripple

More Related Videos

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

In Vivo Measurement of Hindlimb Dorsiflexor Isometric Torque from Pig

In Vivo Measurement of Hindlimb Dorsiflexor Isometric Torque from Pig

Published on: September 3, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between In Vivo and Ex Vivo Studies with the "Avatar" Technique to Advance Muscle Mechanics Research

Published on: August 18, 2023

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

In Vivo Measurement of Hindlimb Dorsiflexor Isometric Torque from Pig

In Vivo Measurement of Hindlimb Dorsiflexor Isometric Torque from Pig

Published on: September 3, 2021

Area of Science:

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES)
Biomechanics
Human Physiology

Background:

Asynchronous electrical stimulation is known to reduce muscle fatigue.
However, asynchronous stimulation may introduce force ripple, affecting contraction smoothness.
This study investigates force ripple during asynchronous and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantify force ripple during asynchronous and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation.
To compare force ripple across various stimulation frequencies.
To determine optimal stimulation parameters for smooth, fatigue-reducing muscle contractions.

Main Methods:

Measured force ripple during 5 asynchronous stimulation protocols.
Included 2 conventional stimulation protocols and 3 volitional contractions.
Conducted experiments on 12 healthy individuals.

Main Results:

Conventional 40 Hz and asynchronous 16 Hz stimulation yielded contractions as smooth as volitional contractions.
Asynchronous stimulation at 8, 10, and 12 Hz resulted in significant force ripple.
Lower stimulation frequencies are associated with increased ripple.

Conclusions:

While lower frequencies reduce fatigue, they can increase force ripple.
Further research is needed to understand the relationship between force ripple and movement smoothness.
Optimizing stimulation frequency for NMES requires balancing fatigue reduction and minimizing ripple.