Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
Published on: November 20, 2016
Blood conservation strategies in cardiac surgery: more is better
Dimitrios V Avgerinos1, William DeBois2, Arash Salemi2
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA davgerinos@gmail.com.
Insights
Implementing aggressive intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) and reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) prime significantly lowers blood transfusions in cardiac surgery. This blood conservation strategy improves patient outcomes and reduces complications.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Anesthesiology
- Transfusion Medicine
Background:
- Up to 50% of cardiac procedures necessitate blood transfusions, associated with adverse patient outcomes.
- Updated 2011 Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS)/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) guidelines recommend enhanced blood conservation techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of an aggressive intraoperative blood conservation strategy in cardiac surgery.
- To assess the impact of modified intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) priming on transfusion rates and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of a cardiac surgery database comparing two periods: pre- and post-implementation of a new blood conservation strategy (March 2012).
- The strategy included more aggressive IAD based on a nomogram and reduced CPB prime volume.
- Retrograde autologous priming (RAP) method remained consistent.
Main Results:
- A significant reduction in intraoperative hematocrit change (14% vs. 28%, P=0.01) was observed.
- Increased mean IAD volume (655 vs. 390 ml, P=0.02) and reduced CPB prime volume (1000 vs. 1600 ml, P=0.03) were noted.
- Perioperative transfusions decreased (29% vs. 49%, P=0.02), alongside reductions in respiratory failure (3% vs. 7%, P=0.03), pneumonia (1% vs. 3.1%, P=0.01), chest tube output (350 vs. 730 ml, P=0.01), reoperation for bleeding (1.2% vs. 2.5%, P=0.04), and length of stay (6.1 vs. 8.2 days, P=0.05).
Conclusions:
- Aggressive blood conservation strategies, including IAD and low CPB prime with RAP, are safe and effective in cardiac surgery.
- This approach significantly reduces blood transfusions, perioperative morbidity, and mortality.
- Improved patient outcomes are directly linked to this comprehensive three-way blood conservation strategy.
Objectives:
Recent data show that up to 50% of heart procedures require blood transfusion, which can have adverse long- and short-term outcomes for the patient. This led to the updated 2011 Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS)/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) guidelines in an attempt to adopt more effective blood conservation techniques. We present our results after the implementation of a more aggressive strategy for intraoperative blood conservation in cardiac surgery.
Methods:
Our cardiac surgery database was reviewed retrospectively, comparing outcomes from two different time periods, after the implementation of a more effective two-way blood conservation strategy beginning in March 2012: more aggressive intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) based on a newly constructed nomogram, and the use of a shorter length circuit of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) which allowed for lower fluid volume as a prime. The method of retrograde autologous priming (RAP) was the same for both time periods.
Results:
A total of 1126 patients (Group 1) were studied in a 12-month period (March 2012-February 2013) after the implementation of the new strategy, and compared with 3758 patients (Group 2) of the previous 36-month period (March 2009-February 2012). There was a significant reduction in the percent change of the intraoperative haematocrit between Groups 1 and 2 (14 vs 28%, P = 0.01), with an increase in the mean IAD volume (655 vs 390 ml, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the CPB priming volume (1000 vs 1600 ml, P = 0.03). Group 1 required significantly less blood transfusions in the perioperative period (29 vs 49%, P = 0.02) and had significantly reduced postoperative rates of respiratory failure (3 vs 7%, P = 0.03), pneumonia (1 vs 3.1%, P = 0.01), chest tube output (350 vs 730 ml, P = 0.01), reoperation for bleeding (1.2 vs 2.5%, P = 0.04) and length of stay (6.1 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.05).
Conclusions:
Blood conservation is safe and effective in reducing transfusions in cardiac surgery, minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aggressive IAD and low CPB prime, along with effective RAP, is the three-way blood conservation strategy that leads to improved outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

