Macrophages migrate in an activation-dependent manner to chemokines involved in neuroinflammation
Daphne Y S Vogel1, Priscilla D A M Heijnen, Marjolein Breur
1Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam VU University Medical Centre, MF J283, P,O, Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, Netherlands. d.vogel@vumc.nl.
Background:
In neuroinflammatory diseases, macrophages can play a dual role in the process of tissue damage, depending on their activation status (M1 / M2). M1 macrophages are considered to exert damaging effects to neurons, whereas M2 macrophages are reported to aid regeneration and repair of neurons. Their migration within the central nervous system may be of critical importance in the final outcome of neurodegeneration in neuroinflammatory diseases e.g. multiple sclerosis (MS). To provide insight into this process, we examined the migratory capacity of human monocyte-derived M1 and M2 polarised macrophages towards chemoattractants, relevant for neuroinflammatory diseases like MS.
Methods:
Primary cultures of human monocyte-derived macrophages were exposed to interferon gamma and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to evoke proinflammatory (M1) activation or IL-4 to evoke anti-inflammatory (M2) activation. In a TAXIScan assay, migration of M0, M1 and M2 towards chemoattractants was measured and quantified. Furthermore the adhesion capacity and the expression levels of integrins as well as chemokine receptors of M0, M1 and M2 were assessed. Alterations in cell morphology were analysed using fluorescent labelling of the cytoskeleton.
Results:
Significant differences were observed between M1 and M2 macrophages in the migration towards chemoattractants. We show that M2 macrophages migrated over longer distances towards CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10, CXCL12 and C1q compared to non-activated (M0) and M1 macrophages. No differences were observed in the adhesion of M0, M1 and M2 macrophages to multiple matrix components, nor in the expression of integrins and chemokine receptors. Significant changes were observed in the cytoskeleton organization upon stimulation with CCL2, M0, M1 and M2 macrophages adopt a spherical morphology and the cytoskeleton is rapidly rearranged. M0 and M2 macrophages are able to form filopodia, whereas M1 macrophages only adapt a spherical morphology.
Conclusions:
Together our results indicate that the alternative activation status of macrophages promotes their migratory properties to chemoattractants relevant for neuroinflammatory diseases like MS. Conversely, classically activated, proinflammatory macrophages have reduced migratory properties. Based on our results, we postulate that the activation status of the macrophage influences the capacity of the macrophages to rearrange their cytoskeleton. This is the first step in understanding how modulation of macrophage activation affects macrophage migration in neuroinflammatory diseases like MS.
Insights
M2 macrophages, crucial for nerve repair, show enhanced migration towards key signals in neuroinflammatory diseases like multiple sclerosis. Conversely, M1 macrophages, linked to damage, exhibit reduced migration, impacting disease progression.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimmunology
- Cellular Biology
- Pathophysiology
Background:
- Macrophages play a dual role in neuroinflammation, with M1 types potentially causing damage and M2 types promoting repair.
- Macrophage migration within the central nervous system is critical for outcomes in diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the migratory capacity of human M1 and M2 polarized macrophages towards chemoattractants relevant to MS.
- To understand how macrophage activation status influences their migration in neuroinflammatory contexts.
Main Methods:
- Human monocyte-derived macrophages were polarized into M1 (pro-inflammatory) or M2 (anti-inflammatory) states.
- Migration was quantified using a TAXIScan assay, with adhesion, integrin, and chemokine receptor expression also assessed.
- Cytoskeleton rearrangements were analyzed via fluorescent labeling.
Main Results:
- M2 macrophages exhibited significantly greater migration distances towards multiple chemoattractants (CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10, CXCL12, C1q) compared to M0 and M1 macrophages.
- No significant differences were found in adhesion or expression of integrins and chemokine receptors among M0, M1, and M2 macrophages.
- Macrophage activation status influenced cytoskeleton organization and morphology changes in response to chemoattractants, with M0 and M2 forming filopodia while M1 adopted a spherical shape.
Conclusions:
- Alternative M2 macrophage activation enhances migratory properties towards key chemoattractants in neuroinflammatory diseases.
- Classical M1 macrophage activation results in reduced migratory capacity.
- Macrophage activation status critically influences cytoskeleton rearrangement, impacting migration in neuroinflammatory conditions like MS.
Related Concept Videos
Immune Surveillance by NK Cells and Phagocytes
Natural Killer Cells: The Fast Responders
NK cells are large granular lymphocytes found in the blood and lymphatic system. These...
Inflammation
Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Acute Inflammation I: Cellular Phase
Cells of the Innate Immune Response
Phagocytes
Phagocytes police the peripheral tissues by removing cellular debris and responding to the invasion of foreign substances or pathogens. Many phagocytes attack and remove microorganisms even before lymphocytes detect them. The human body has two general...
Inflammatory Response
Inflammation can be triggered by various stimuli, such as impact, abrasion, chemical irritation, infections, and extreme hot or cold temperatures. These can damage cells and connective tissue fibers,...


