Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts01:57

Protein Complexes with Interchangeable Parts

2.1K
Groups of proteins may form a complex where each protein in this complex has a different role in the overall execution of the complex’s function. Often some of the proteins in the complex can be replaced by a closely related variant to give a complex that contains many of the same components yet is functionally distinct.
The SCF ubiquitin ligase is a protein complex of five individual proteins. This complex attaches ubiquitin to other target proteins to mark them for degradation. In order...
2.1K
In vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In vitro Mutagenesis

4.9K
4.9K
In-vitro Mutagenesis01:16

In-vitro Mutagenesis

14.8K
To learn more about the function of a gene, researchers can observe what happens when the gene is inactivated or “knocked out,” by creating genetically engineered knockout animals. Knockout mice have been particularly useful as models for human diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes.
14.8K
Exon Recombination02:32

Exon Recombination

3.1K
The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes. 
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...
3.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inflation experiments and inverse finite element modelling of posterior human sclera.

Journal of biomechanics·2019
Same author

Adventitial Stromal Cells Define Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Tissue Niches.

Immunity·2019
Same author

Intravital imaging of a spheroid-based orthotopic model of melanoma in the mouse ear skin.

Intravital·2017
Same author

Comment on "Local impermeant anions establish the neuronal chloride concentration".

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2014
Same author

Evading immune cell uptake and clearance requires PEG grafting at densities substantially exceeding the minimum for brush conformation.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2014
Same author

Role of outer-pore residue Y380 in U-type inactivation of KV2.1 channels.

The Journal of membrane biology·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast
02:44

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.1K

Shaker IR T449 mutants separate C- from U-type inactivation.

Quentin Jamieson1, Stephen W Jones

  • 1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.

The Journal of Membrane Biology
|February 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Point mutations at Shaker potassium channel residue T449 differentially affect C-type and U-type slow inactivation. This study clarifies which inactivation types are modulated by T449 mutations, impacting our understanding of channel gating.

More Related Videos

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.4K
Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast
07:18

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

10.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast
02:44

Author Spotlight: Enhanced Isolation of Interaction-Null Mutants in Yeast

Published on: December 29, 2023

1.1K
A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
07:55

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Published on: March 7, 2019

8.4K
Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast
07:18

Gene-targeted Random Mutagenesis to Select Heterochromatin-destabilizing Proteasome Mutants in Fission Yeast

Published on: May 15, 2018

10.0K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology
  • Biophysics
  • Ion channel function

Background:

  • Shaker potassium channels exhibit two forms of slow inactivation: C-type and U-type.
  • Previous studies implicated residue T449 in the outer pore in modulating Shaker channel inactivation rates.
  • The specific contribution of T449 mutations to C-type versus U-type inactivation remained unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the distinct effects of T449 point mutations on C-type and U-type slow inactivation in Shaker potassium channels.
  • To test the hypothesis that T449 mutations exclusively affect C-type inactivation.

Main Methods:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of the Shaker potassium channel at residue T449 (T449A, T449Y, T449V).
  • Electrophysiological recordings to assess channel inactivation kinetics under varying extracellular potassium concentrations.
  • Automated parameter estimation for a 12-state Markov model to analyze inactivation gating mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Mutations T449A accelerated inactivation, consistent with C-type inactivation, while T449Y/V slowed inactivation, exhibiting U-type characteristics.
  • High extracellular potassium enhanced U-type inactivation (T449Y/V) but inhibited C-type inactivation (T449A).
  • Markov modeling indicated U-type inactivation primarily from open states at positive potentials and C-type inactivation involving closed-inactivated states.

Conclusions:

  • T449 mutations differentially modulate Shaker potassium channel C-type and U-type inactivation.
  • The study provides evidence that T449 primarily influences C-type inactivation, challenging previous assumptions.
  • Both C-type and U-type inactivation pathways involve transitions through both open and closed inactivated states.