Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
Published on: October 24, 2025
Participatory forest management in Ethiopia: learning from pilot projects.
Aklilu Ameha1, H O Larsen, Mulugeta Lemenih
1Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark, aklilu@life.ku.dk.
Participatory forest management (PFM) in Ethiopia improved forest conditions and maintained income for local communities. However, long-term success faces challenges due to concerns about the institutional effectiveness of Forest User Groups (FUGs) after project completion.
Area of Science:
- Forestry
- Environmental Management
- Community-Based Conservation
Background:
- Decentralized forest management, including Participatory Forest Management (PFM), is promoted globally to combat tropical deforestation.
- Ethiopia is actively implementing PFM as a decentralized approach to forest conservation.
- Evaluating existing PFM pilots is crucial for informing future conservation strategies and projects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the outcomes of five pilot Participatory Forest Management (PFM) programs in Ethiopia.
- To assess the impact of PFM on forest income, forest conditions, sense of ownership, and institutional effectiveness of Forest User Groups (FUGs).
- To provide insights for future PFM program design and implementation in Ethiopia.
Main Methods:
- The study utilized qualitative data from Forest User Group (FUG) members across five PFM pilot sites in Ethiopia.
- Data collection involved group discussions, key informant interviews, and transect walks.
- Outcome variables (forest income, forest condition, ownership, FUG effectiveness) were assessed at three time points: pre-PFM, during implementation, and post-project.
Main Results:
- All five PFM programs were perceived to improve forest conditions, with improvements sustained in four cases after project conclusion.
- Regulated forest access under PFM did not negatively impact community forest income.
- Significant concerns were identified regarding the long-term institutional effectiveness of FUGs once external project support ended.
Conclusions:
- Participatory Forest Management (PFM) shows promise in improving forest conditions and sustaining community livelihoods in Ethiopia.
- The long-term viability of PFM hinges on addressing the institutional capacity and effectiveness of local Forest User Groups (FUGs) post-project.
- Further research and support are needed to ensure the sustained institutional strength of FUGs for effective long-term forest management.
More Related Videos
04:35Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
12:26Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling SAHM
Published on: October 11, 2016