Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Arousal Theory01:23

Optimal Arousal Theory

1.3K
The optimal arousal theory suggests that performance is maximized when an individual experiences a moderate level of arousal. This theory is closely tied to the Yerkes-Dodson law, which illustrates an inverted U-shaped relationship between arousal and performance. The law, formulated by psychologists Robert Yerkes and John Dodson, implies an ideal arousal level for optimal performance, and deviations from this level can lead to declines in effectiveness.
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
1.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reverse-engineering psychological resilience: A review and quantitative evaluation of psychometric instruments used in resilience research.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

The Human Visual Claustrum Responses to Physical Stimulus Properties and Subjective Content During Movie Viewing.

Human brain mapping·2026
Same author

Looking in the right place: Strategy-based vs. capacity-based cognitive enhancement. Reply to comments on "To enhance or not to enhance".

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

Development and validation of the SuPr-10 questionnaire for suicidality assessment in primary care patients with depressive symptoms.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Worked examples, cognitive aptitudes and the self-explanation mechanism - A replication.

The British journal of educational psychology·2026
Same author

The Development and Validation of the Primary Affect Inventory (PAFI), a Self-Rating Questionnaire for the Measurement of Primary Affective States.

Journal of personality assessment·2026
Same journal

General and non-general intelligence factors simultaneously influence SAT, SAT-V, and SAT-M performance.

Intelligence·2026
Same journal

More than <math><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow></math> : Verbal and performance IQ as predictors of socio-political attitudes.

Intelligence·2025
Same journal

The effect of processing speed on academic fluency in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Intelligence·2025
Same journal

Multivariate analysis of the Scarr-Rowe interaction across middle childhood and early adolescence.

Intelligence·2025
Same journal

Predicting political beliefs with polygenic scores for cognitive performance and educational attainment.

Intelligence·2024
Same journal

Relative Contributions of <i>g</i> and Basic Domain-Specific Mathematics Skills to Complex Mathematics Competencies.

Intelligence·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

10.5K

Neural efficiency as a function of task demands.

Beate Dunst1, Mathias Benedek1, Emanuel Jauk1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Austria.

Intelligence
|February 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The neural efficiency hypothesis suggests brighter individuals use less brain power for tasks. This study found brain activation differences only appear when tasks have the same difficulty, not the same person-specific difficulty.

Keywords:
IntelligenceNeural efficiencyTailored testingTask difficultyfMRI

More Related Videos

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.2K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
06:57

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks

Published on: August 9, 2016

10.5K
Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task
07:08

Estimate the Cognitive Load Using Electrocardiographic Measure: A Human-AI Collaborative Task

Published on: December 5, 2025

1.2K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Intelligence Research

Background:

  • The neural efficiency hypothesis posits that higher intelligence correlates with lower neural activation during cognitive tasks.
  • Previous research often used tasks of equal objective difficulty, potentially confounding results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the neural efficiency hypothesis holds when task difficulty is person-specific.
  • To examine the relationship between intelligence and brain activation under controlled task demands.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activation in 58 participants.
  • Participants were categorized into lower and higher intelligence groups.
  • Participants completed inductive reasoning tasks with varying person-specific and sample-based difficulties.

Main Results:

  • Differences in brain activation and task performance were observed only when tasks shared the same sample-based difficulty.
  • No significant differences were found when comparing tasks with matched person-specific difficulty.
  • Lower intelligence individuals performed similarly to higher intelligence individuals on tasks of matched person-specific difficulty.

Conclusions:

  • Neural efficiency appears to be an adaptive response of brain activation to task demands, dependent on individual ability.
  • The findings challenge a simplistic view of neural efficiency and highlight the importance of task difficulty normalization.