Conceptual and empirical strengths of the authentic/hubristic model of pride
Jessica L Tracy1, Richard W Robins2
1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Abstract:
The authentic/hubristic (A/H) model of pride has been empirically supported by dozens of studies drawing on thousands of participants. The model involves four distinct components, most central of which is the finding that pride is not a unitary construct but rather is comprised of two distinct facets, referred to as authentic and hubristic pride. In the present article, we review the four critical components of the A/H model, and explain why Holbrook and colleagues' (2013) critique raises questions for one part of one of these components only-the attribution distinction between the two prides. We then raise questions for Holbrook and colleagues' alternative model of pride, and conclude by noting several convergences between the two perspectives.
More Related Videos
08:01Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Fundamental Attribution Error
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Self-Serving Bias
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
