Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

09:18
Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
Published on: January 12, 2019
10.0K
Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale and Motor Function Measure-20 in non ambulant SMA patients.
E Mazzone1, R De Sanctis1, L Fanelli1
1Department of Paediatric Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Neuromuscular Disorders : NMD
|February 5, 2014
Summary
The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale and Motor Function Measure 20 show correlation in non-ambulant SMA patients. The Hammersmith scale suits stronger patients, while MFM-20 captures changes in weaker individuals.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Pediatric Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder affecting motor neurons.
- Assessing functional motor abilities in non-ambulant individuals with SMA is crucial for clinical trials and patient management.
- Standardized outcome measures are needed to reliably track disease progression and treatment efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale (HFMS) and the 20-item Motor Function Measure (MFM-20) in non-ambulant SMA patients.
- To assess the performance of both scales at baseline and over a 12-month period.
- To determine the suitability of each scale for different severity levels within the non-ambulant SMA population.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, longitudinal, multi-centric study design.
- Inclusion of 74 non-ambulant SMA patients (children and adults) at baseline.
- Assessment using HFMS and MFM-20 at baseline and 12 months for a subset of 49 patients.
Main Results:
- Strong baseline correlation (0.733) between HFMS and MFM-20 scores.
- Moderate correlation (0.48) between the 12-month changes in both scales.
- HFMS demonstrated suitability for stronger non-ambulant patients, while MFM-20 was more sensitive in very weak patients, capturing axial and upper limb activities.
Conclusions:
- Both HFMS and MFM-20 provide valuable information for assessing non-ambulant SMA patients.
- The scales appear to function differently at the extremes of ability spectrum.
- The choice of scale in clinical trials should consider patient inclusion criteria and expected magnitude of change.

