On-bead fluorescent DNA nanoprobes to analyze base excision repair activities

Guillaume Gines1, Christine Saint-Pierre1, Didier Gasparutto1

  • 1Laboratoire des Lésions des Acides Nucléiques, SCIB-UMR E3 CEA-UJF/INAC/CEA Grenoble, Grenoble Cedex 09 38054, France.

Analytica Chimica Acta
|February 5, 2014
PubMed

Insights

This study presents a novel fluorescent biosensor assay for detecting DNA repair enzyme activity. The assay efficiently measures base excision repair (BER) enzyme functions, aiding in the discovery of DNA repair inhibitors.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry
  • Genetics

Background:

  • DNA integrity is crucial and constantly challenged by endogenous and exogenous agents, leading to mutations associated with diseases like cancer.
  • Organisms possess sophisticated DNA repair mechanisms, including base excision repair (BER), to counteract DNA damage.
  • Accurate detection of BER enzyme activity is vital for understanding DNA repair pathways and developing therapeutic interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an original, sensitive biosensor assay for detecting DNA repair enzyme activity within the base excision repair (BER) pathway.
  • To characterize the assay's performance using specific BER enzymes, alkyl-adenine glycosylase (AAG) and human AP-endonuclease (APE1).
  • To demonstrate the assay's utility in screening for inhibitors of DNA repair enzymes.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a biosensor utilizing fluorescent hairpin-shaped nucleic acid probes immobilized on magnetic beads.
  • Incorporation of specific DNA lesions (hypoxanthine for AAG, tetrahydrofuran analog for APE1) into the probes.
  • Detection of enzymatic repair activity via fluorescence measurement of cleaved probes in the supernatant.

Main Results:

  • The assay successfully detected the activity of AAG and APE1 enzymes in a fast, specific, and quantitative manner.
  • A low detection limit was achieved, with 1 μg mL⁻¹ for APE1 and 50 μg mL⁻¹ for AAG using HeLa nuclear extracts.
  • The assay requires minimal probe amounts (1 pmol per test), indicating high efficiency and sensitivity.

Conclusions:

  • The developed on-bead fluorescent biosensor assay provides a robust method for measuring DNA repair enzyme activities.
  • This assay is suitable for analyzing purified enzymes and cell-free extracts, offering a sensitive and quantitative approach.
  • The assay's design makes it a valuable tool for screening potential inhibitors of DNA repair enzymes, relevant for cancer therapy and genetic disease research.

Related Concept Videos

Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

Overview
33.7K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

10.9K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:38

Nucleotide Excision Repair

DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
4.6K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

One of the common DNA damages is the chemical alteration of single bases by alkylation, oxidation, or deamination. The altered bases cause mispairing and strand breakage during replication. This type of damage causes minimal change to the DNA double helix structure and can be repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathways. BER corrects damaged DNA sequences by removing the damaged base and restoring the original base sequence using the complementary strand as a template.
The first step of...
20.3K
Base Excision Repair01:54

Base Excision Repair

4.3K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
6.3K