Mode of action analysis for liver tumors from oral 1,4-dioxane exposures and evidence-based dose response assessment

Michael Dourson1, John Reichard1, Patricia Nance1

  • 1Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, 2300 Montana Ave., Suite 409, Cincinnati, OH 45211, United States.

Insights

1,4-Dioxane exposure causes liver tumors in rodents through cell damage and regeneration. A new Reference Dose (RfD) is proposed to protect against this regenerative liver hyperplasia.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Environmental Health
  • Carcinogenesis

Background:

  • 1,4-Dioxane is a common industrial solvent and contaminant in consumer products.
  • Rodent studies consistently show liver tumors after chronic 1,4-dioxane exposure.
  • Previous studies noted discrepancies in non-neoplastic liver lesions between rats and mice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify differences in non-neoplastic liver lesions between rats and mice exposed to 1,4-dioxane.
  • To investigate the mode of action for 1,4-dioxane-induced liver tumorigenesis.
  • To propose a health-protective Reference Dose (RfD) and Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG).

Main Methods:

  • Re-examination of mouse liver slides from a 1978 NCI bioassay.
  • Analysis of dose-related non-neoplastic liver changes, including hypertrophy, necrosis, and inflammation.
  • Evaluation of genotoxicity, tumor promotion, and DNA synthesis stimulation.
  • Application of EPA 2005 Guidelines and Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach.

Main Results:

  • A dose-related increase in hepatocyte hypertrophy, necrosis, inflammation, and hyperplastic foci was observed in mice.
  • 1,4-Dioxane demonstrated tumor-promoting activity and stimulated DNA synthesis but was not genotoxic.
  • The weight of evidence supports a mode of action involving cytotoxicity followed by regenerative hyperplasia.
  • A BMD analysis yielded an RfD of 0.05 mg/kg/day for regenerative liver hyperplasia.

Conclusions:

  • 1,4-Dioxane induces liver tumors in rodents via cytotoxicity and regenerative hyperplasia.
  • The proposed RfD of 0.05 mg/kg/day provides protection against non-cancerous liver effects.
  • A Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) of 350 μg/L is suggested for drinking water.

Related Concept Videos

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic01:21

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response...
371
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
5.2K
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
204
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
2.0K
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship01:14

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship

For drugs producing a quantal response, onset occurs when plasma concentration reaches a minimum effective level (Cmin). The drug's action duration depends on how long the plasma concentration remains above Cmin.Two primary factors influence this duration: dose size and the rate of drug removal from the action site. Both depend on the drug's redistribution to poorly perfused tissues and elimination processes. A larger dose promotes rapid onset and prolongs the effect's duration.Consider a...
124