Mode of action analysis for liver tumors from oral 1,4-dioxane exposures and evidence-based dose response assessment
Michael Dourson1, John Reichard1, Patricia Nance1
1Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, 2300 Montana Ave., Suite 409, Cincinnati, OH 45211, United States.
Abstract:
1,4-Dioxane is found in consumer products and is used as a solvent in manufacturing. Studies in rodents show liver tumors to be consistently reported after chronic oral exposure. However, there were differences in the reporting of non-neoplastic lesions in the livers of rats and mice. In order to clarify these differences, a reread of mouse liver slides from the 1978 NCI bioassay on 1,4-dioxane in drinking water was conducted. This reread clearly identified dose-related non-neoplastic changes in the liver; specifically, a dose-related increase in the hypertrophic response of hepatocytes, followed by necrosis, inflammation and hyperplastic hepatocellular foci. 1,4-Dioxane does not cause point mutations, DNA repair, or initiation. However, it appears to promote tumors and stimulate DNA synthesis. Using EPA Guidelines (2005), the weight of the evidence suggests that 1,4-dioxane causes liver tumors in rats and mice through cytotoxicity followed by regenerative hyperplasia. Specific key events in this mode of action are identified. A Reference Dose (RfD) of 0.05mg/kgday is proposed to protect against regenerative liver hyperplasia based on a benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Based on this RfD, a maximum contaminant level goal of 350μg/L is proposed using a default relative source contribution for water of 20%.
Insights
1,4-Dioxane exposure causes liver tumors in rodents through cell damage and regeneration. A new Reference Dose (RfD) is proposed to protect against this regenerative liver hyperplasia.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Environmental Health
- Carcinogenesis
Background:
- 1,4-Dioxane is a common industrial solvent and contaminant in consumer products.
- Rodent studies consistently show liver tumors after chronic 1,4-dioxane exposure.
- Previous studies noted discrepancies in non-neoplastic liver lesions between rats and mice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To clarify differences in non-neoplastic liver lesions between rats and mice exposed to 1,4-dioxane.
- To investigate the mode of action for 1,4-dioxane-induced liver tumorigenesis.
- To propose a health-protective Reference Dose (RfD) and Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG).
Main Methods:
- Re-examination of mouse liver slides from a 1978 NCI bioassay.
- Analysis of dose-related non-neoplastic liver changes, including hypertrophy, necrosis, and inflammation.
- Evaluation of genotoxicity, tumor promotion, and DNA synthesis stimulation.
- Application of EPA 2005 Guidelines and Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach.
Main Results:
- A dose-related increase in hepatocyte hypertrophy, necrosis, inflammation, and hyperplastic foci was observed in mice.
- 1,4-Dioxane demonstrated tumor-promoting activity and stimulated DNA synthesis but was not genotoxic.
- The weight of evidence supports a mode of action involving cytotoxicity followed by regenerative hyperplasia.
- A BMD analysis yielded an RfD of 0.05 mg/kg/day for regenerative liver hyperplasia.
Conclusions:
- 1,4-Dioxane induces liver tumors in rodents via cytotoxicity and regenerative hyperplasia.
- The proposed RfD of 0.05 mg/kg/day provides protection against non-cancerous liver effects.
- A Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) of 350 μg/L is suggested for drinking water.
Related Concept Videos
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview
Toxicity Testing in Animals
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship


