Effects of the Programmed Nutrition Beef Program on meat quality characteristics
K J Phelps1, J S Drouillard, J S Jennings
1Kansas State University, Dep. of Animal Sciences and Industry, Manhattan 66506.
Journal of Animal Science
|February 5, 2014
Summary
Alternative feeding strategies improved beef water-holding capacity and reduced moisture loss. However, exogenous growth promotants decreased tenderness in beef steaks, impacting sensory evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Animal Science
- Food Science
- Meat Science
Background:
- Beef production involves various finishing strategies impacting meat quality.
- Understanding the effects of dietary supplements and growth promotants is crucial for optimizing beef characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of alternative finishing diets and exogenous growth promotant programs on beef steak color and cooked meat quality.
- To determine potential interactions between dietary strategies and growth promotants on beef characteristics.
Main Methods:
- A 2x2 factorial design was used with 64 pens of beef steers, comparing conventional (CON) vs. Programmed Nutrition (PN) diets and the presence (EGP+) vs. absence (EGP-) of exogenous growth promotants.
- Steaks were evaluated for objective color measurements during retail display and sensory panel assessment of cooked meat characteristics after aging.
Main Results:
- Programmed Nutrition (PN) diets resulted in darker steaks and reduced moisture loss during aging and cooking compared to conventional (CON) diets.
- Exogenous growth promotants (EGP+) negatively affected myofibrillar and overall tenderness, with an interaction observed for tenderness traits.
- No significant interactions were found between feeding strategy and growth promotants for most objective color and cooked meat characteristics.
Conclusions:
- Alternative feeding strategies can enhance water-holding capacity in beef without compromising retail display color.
- The use of exogenous growth promotants may lead to reduced tenderness in beef steaks, necessitating careful consideration in production systems.
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
4.4K
ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
4.4K
Proteins: From Genes to Degradation
11.9K
Within a biological system, the DNA encodes the RNA, and the nucleotide sequence in the RNA further defines the amino acid sequence in the protein. This is referred to as “The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology” - a term coined by Francis Crick. Central dogma is a firm principle in biology that defines the flow of genetic information within any life form. The two fundamental steps in central dogma are - transcription and translation.
Transcription is the synthesis of RNA...
Transcription is the synthesis of RNA...
11.9K
Proteins: From Genes to Degradation
3.5K
3.5K
Mechanical Protein Function
1.7K
1.7K
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
17.9K
Like all living organisms, plants require organic and inorganic nutrients to survive, reproduce, grow and maintain homeostasis. To identify nutrients that are essential for plant functioning, researchers have leveraged a technique called hydroponics. In hydroponic culture systems, plants are grown—without soil—in water-based solutions containing nutrients. At least 17 nutrients have been identified as essential elements required by plants. Plants acquire these elements from the...
17.9K
Mechanical Protein Functions
4.4K
Proteins perform many mechanical functions in a cell. These proteins can be classified into two general categories- proteins that generate mechanical forces and proteins that are subjected to mechanical forces. Proteins providing mechanical support to the structure of the cell, such as keratin, are subjected to mechanical force, whereas proteins involved in cell movement and transport of molecules across cell membranes, such as an ion pump, are examples of generating mechanical force.
4.4K


