Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

P300 and the menstrual cycle.

K M Fleck¹, J Polich

¹Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

|March 1, 1988

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.

Brain and cognition·2001

Same author

P3a from a passive visual stimulus task.

Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·2001

Same author

P300 asymmetry in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.

Psychiatry research·2001

Same author

Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b.

Brain topography·2001

Same author

P300 and alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD).

Psychophysiology·2001

Same author

Auditory P3a deficits in male subjects at high risk for alcoholism.

Biological psychiatry·2001

Same journal

Coming to terms with brain waves.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2014

Same journal

Habituation of lower leg stretch responses in Parkinson's disease.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000

Same journal

Asymmetry of cortical excitability revealed by transcranial stimulation in a patient with focal motor epilepsy and cortical myoclonus.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000

Same journal

Evoked isometric muscle contractions in myopathies: analysis of pathophysiological properties by different stimulus patterns.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000

Same journal

Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000

Same journal

Electrophysiological studies in mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·2000

See all related articles

Menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive use do not impact event-related potentials (ERPs). This study found no significant changes in N1, P2, N2, or P3 components across the menstrual cycle or between contraceptive users and non-users.

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Psychophysiology
Cognitive Science

Background:

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are electrophysiological measures reflecting cognitive processing.
Hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle may influence neural activity.
Oral contraceptives can alter hormonal profiles, potentially affecting brain function.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the influence of the menstrual cycle on ERP components.
To determine if oral contraceptive use affects ERPs.
To examine potential interactions between menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive use on ERPs.

Main Methods:

Auditory discrimination paradigm used to elicit ERPs in 20 adult female subjects.
ERPs measured on two occasions: early in the menstrual cycle and approximately 14 days later.

Keywords:

Americas Behavior California Contraception Contraceptive Methods Data Collection Developed Countries Family Planning Measurement Menstrual Cycle Menstruation North America Northern America Oral Contraceptives Psychosocial Factors Reproduction Research Methodology United States

Related Experiment Videos

Amplitude and latency of N1, P2, N2, and P3 (P300) components analyzed.

Comparison between subjects using and not using oral contraceptives.

Main Results:

No significant differences in amplitude or latency for N1, P2, N2, or P3 components were found across menstrual cycle phases.
No significant differences or interactions were observed between oral contraceptive users and non-users for any ERP component.
Menstrual cycle phase and oral contraceptive status did not demonstrate a measurable effect on the studied ERPs.

Conclusions:

Menstrual cycle phase does not appear to modulate event-related potential components.
Oral contraceptive use does not significantly alter ERP amplitudes or latencies.
The P3 component and other ERPs are robust to hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptive use in this cohort.