Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

A Mouse Model of Single and Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
04:19

A Mouse Model of Single and Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: June 20, 2017

10.9K

Traumatic brain injury using mouse models.

Yi Ping Zhang1, Jun Cai, Lisa B E Shields

  • 1Norton Neuroscience Institute, Norton Healthcare, 210 East Gray Street, Suite 1102, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA, yipingzhang50@gmail.com.

Translational Stroke Research
|February 5, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zoster Segmental Paralysis: Clinical and Electrodiagnostic Features in a Retrospective Case Series of 17 Patients.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Lecanemab over a two-year duration: Key insights from a regional specialty medical center.

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease·2026
Same author

Early blood-spinal cord barrier stabilization preserves peri-lesional tissue and improves recovery after SCI.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Thenar Muscle Atrophy: Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Ultrasound Features in 197 Patients.

Neurology international·2025
Same author

The "Nail File Sign": A Report of Three Cases With Varied Etiologies.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in the Very Elderly: Clinical, Electrodiagnostic, and Ultrasound Features in a Cohort of 187 Patients.

Neurology international·2025
Same journal

Sedation in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiological Basis and Evidence for Commonly Used Agents.

Translational stroke research·2026
Same journal

Correction to: The Cerebrovascular Reactivity Adjusted Fractional Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations Abnormalities in Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis and Occlusive Disease.

Translational stroke research·2026
Same journal

Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Swallowing Function in Post-stroke Dysphagia: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Translational stroke research·2026
Same journal

Impact of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps on Clinical Outcome after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Translational Narrative Review.

Translational stroke research·2026
Same journal

Multiscale Mechanisms that Underlie Intermittent Theta-burst Stimulation in Post-stroke Motor Recovery: From Molecular Signaling to Network Reorganization.

Translational stroke research·2026
Same journal

IGF-1 Inhibits the Hemodynamics‑Induced Progression of Intracranial Aneurysms by Modulating the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells.

Translational stroke research·2026
See all related articles

Mouse models offer cost-effective, versatile tools for traumatic brain injury (TBI) research, aiding in understanding injury mechanisms and screening therapeutic targets. Continued development of these models is crucial for advancing TBI research.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Trauma Research
  • Animal Models

Background:

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) research benefits from versatile animal models.
  • Mouse models are advantageous due to cost, maintenance, and genetic modification capabilities.
  • Understanding TBI mechanisms and identifying therapeutic targets requires robust preclinical models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current mouse models of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
  • To compare different TBI induction methods in mice, including closed head injuries (CHI) and penetrating injuries.
  • To discuss the advantages and limitations of mouse models in TBI research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on mouse models for TBI.
  • Comparison of weight drop, fluid percussion, and controlled cortical impact (CCI) models for CHI.

More Related Videos

Acute Brain Trauma in Mice Followed By Longitudinal Two-photon Imaging
11:14

Acute Brain Trauma in Mice Followed By Longitudinal Two-photon Imaging

Published on: April 6, 2014

11.9K
Murine Model of Controlled Cortical Impact for the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury
05:01

Murine Model of Controlled Cortical Impact for the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: August 16, 2019

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

A Mouse Model of Single and Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
04:19

A Mouse Model of Single and Repetitive Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: June 20, 2017

10.9K
Acute Brain Trauma in Mice Followed By Longitudinal Two-photon Imaging
11:14

Acute Brain Trauma in Mice Followed By Longitudinal Two-photon Imaging

Published on: April 6, 2014

11.9K
Murine Model of Controlled Cortical Impact for the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury
05:01

Murine Model of Controlled Cortical Impact for the Induction of Traumatic Brain Injury

Published on: August 16, 2019

10.4K
  • Analysis of models simulating penetrating brain injuries.
  • Discussion of synergistic effects of systemic complications.

    • Main Results:

    • Mouse models effectively replicate various TBI types, including CHI and penetrating injuries.
    • Different models (weight drop, fluid percussion, CCI) have distinct advantages and disadvantages.
    • Challenges exist in replicating high-velocity penetrating injuries and understanding human-mouse biomechanical differences.

    Conclusions:

    • Mouse models are valuable tools for TBI research, offering insights into mechanisms and therapeutic targets.
    • Further refinement of mouse models is necessary to improve TBI recapitulation and translational relevance.
    • Addressing anatomical and biomechanical differences between mice and humans is key for future research.