Comparison of splinting and casting in the management of torus fracture

Emma Neal1

  • 1St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London.

Insights

Torus fractures, common in children, are best managed with splinting. This method is cost-effective, promotes faster recovery, and is parent-preferred, though pain relief evidence is inconclusive.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Pediatric Trauma

Background:

  • Torus fractures, also known as buckle fractures, are common in pediatric populations.
  • Current management strategies for torus fractures exhibit variability in treatment protocols and practitioner preferences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the efficacy of splinting versus plaster of Paris (POP) casting for managing torus fractures in children.
  • To evaluate cost-effectiveness, functional recovery, parental preference, and pain associated with different management options.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted on studies comparing splinting and POP casting for torus fractures.
  • Outcomes assessed included cost-effectiveness, return to function, parental satisfaction, and pain levels.

Main Results:

  • Splinting demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness compared to POP casting.
  • Patients treated with splints showed a quicker return to normal function.
  • Parental preference leaned towards splinting as a management option.

Conclusions:

  • Splinting is a preferred and more effective method for managing pediatric torus fractures due to its cost-effectiveness and faster functional recovery.
  • While splinting offers advantages, further research is needed to conclusively determine its superiority in pain management.