Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.5K
Interference and Diffraction02:18

Interference and Diffraction

28.7K
Interference is a characteristic phenomenon exhibited by waves. When two electromagnetic waves interact with their peaks and troughs coinciding, a resulting wave with enhanced amplitude is produced. This is known as constructive interference. In this case, the two waves interacting are in phase with each other.
28.7K
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

9.5K
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
9.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lower adherence to healthy lifestyle is associated with increased adiposity and cardiovascular risk in youth.

Frontiers in nutrition·2026
Same author

Technology-Based Interventions for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology·2026
Same author

Sport Participation and Nutrition in Students: A Scoping Review of Neuroendocrine and Autonomic Mechanisms Linking Lifestyle Behaviors to Cognitive and Academic Outcomes.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

The Gut Microbiota-Polyphenol-NLRP3 Inflammasome Axis: A Key Regulatory Network Linking Diet to Chronic Inflammation.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

The "Radicular Tank": A Novel Concept in Endodontics Achieved with the MEA Inverse Taper<sup>®</sup> Technique.

Dentistry journal·2026
Same author

Physiological and Perceptual Internal Load During Kitesurfing Under Real-World Sea Conditions.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Flanker interference effects in a line bisection task.

Sergio Chieffi1, Tina Iachini, Alessandro Iavarone

  • 1Department of Experimental Medicine, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy, sergio.chieffi@unina2.it.

Experimental Brain Research
|February 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Performing a reaching task with a flanking distractor significantly amplifies its interference effect on line bisection perception. This suggests increased attention to the distractor enhances its influence.

More Related Videos

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.5K
Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.5K
Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Perception research
  • Visuospatial processing

Background:

  • Flanking distractors are known to influence spatial judgments like line bisection.
  • The precise mechanisms by which distractors exert their influence, particularly when combined with motor actions, require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether performing a reaching movement towards a flanking distractor modifies its interference effect on line bisection.
  • To compare the magnitude of distractor interference in a standard bisection task versus a bisection-plus-reaching task.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a line bisection task with a flanking dot distractor.
  • A second group performed the bisection task followed by a reaching movement to the dot (bisection-plus-reaching task).
  • The dot was positioned laterally to the line, above or below its edge.

Main Results:

  • In both tasks, the subjective midpoint of the line was shifted away from the dot's position.
  • The magnitude of this shift (flanker interference) was significantly greater in the bisection-plus-reaching task compared to the standard bisection task.
  • This indicates an enhanced distractor effect when a motor action is involved.

Conclusions:

  • Performing a reaching action towards a flanking distractor increases its salience and interference in line bisection.
  • Motor engagement with a distractor amplifies its perceptual distorting effects.
  • Attention allocation plays a crucial role in modulating distractor interference in visuospatial tasks.