Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

29.3K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
29.3K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

29.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
29.0K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

28.5K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
28.5K
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

463
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
463
Impact of Social Context on Individuals01:21

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

516
Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...
516
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

26.3K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
26.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Conflict Processing Is Unaffected by Stimulus Duration Across Multiple Visual Tasks: Evidence for Transient over Permanent Activation Models.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

When less is more: single selfhood-related cues elicit higher selfhood ratings than multiple cues.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Theta band activity during event-file retrieval is influenced by stimulus salience in the preceding action episode.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Altered neural oscillatory dynamics underlie reduced anticipatory schema use during event segmentation in adolescents with High-Functioning Autism Spectrum disorder.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

How the influence of cingulate-lingual interactions on event segmentation changes from early to late adolescence.

Scientific reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K

The joint flanker effect: less social than previously thought.

Thomas Dolk1, Bernhard Hommel, Wolfgang Prinz

  • 1Department of Psychology, Max-Planck-Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany, dolk@cbs.mpg.de.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|February 6, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Research suggests automatic co-representation in joint action. However, this study found a "joint" flanker effect even with a non-social co-actor, questioning the need for social interaction in joint action tasks.

More Related Videos

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.1K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.1K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Previous research indicated automatic co-representation of co-actors' actions in joint tasks.
  • Recent findings on the joint Simon effect challenged this, proposing nonsocial accounts.
  • This raised questions about the necessity of social interaction for joint action effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether a nonsocial account can explain the joint flanker task.
  • To test if the social nature of the co-actor influences the joint flanker effect.
  • To determine if automatic co-representation is essential for joint action phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a joint flanker task.
  • The "co-actor" was manipulated to be either a human or a Japanese waving cat.
  • Behavioral responses were analyzed to assess the flanker effect.

Main Results:

  • A significant "joint" flanker effect was observed.
  • This effect occurred regardless of whether the co-actor was human or a non-social entity (Japanese waving cat).
  • The results did not support a social interpretation of the joint flanker effect.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that the joint flanker effect can occur without social interaction.
  • A nonsocial account is feasible for explaining joint action in this task.
  • Automatic co-representation may not solely rely on the social nature of the co-actor.