Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

4.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
4.7K
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

423
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
423
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.1K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.1K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.9K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

5.8K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
5.8K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.4K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to Editor: Beyond Symptom Reduction: A Call to Integrate Well-Being in Psychosis Research and Early Intervention.

Early intervention in psychiatry·2026
Same author

An Exploratory Study Examining the Association Between School-Aged Children's Pretend Play Skills and Their Executive Functioning.

Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics·2026
Same author

Occupational intersectionality: Introduction, contextualisation, and relevance to occupational therapy practice.

Australian occupational therapy journal·2026
Same author

Paediatric occupational therapists' views on applying interoception in practice contexts.

Australian occupational therapy journal·2026
Same author

The Convergent Validity Between Two Adult Self-Report Sensory Processing Scales.

Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie·2026
Same author

"My Sensory Experiences Tool": A Neurodiversity-Affirming Therapeutic Tool to Support the Sensory Challenges and Preferences of Autistic Children and Adults.

Occupational therapy international·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K

Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised Edition online comment bank: development and reliability analysis.

Sylvia Rodger1, Merrill Turpin, Jodie Copley

  • 1Occupational Therapy Division, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
|February 7, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new comment bank for the Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised Edition (SPEF-R Online) was developed and found to be reliable. This tool helps educators provide consistent and timely feedback to occupational therapy students during practice placements.

Keywords:
educationprofessionalreproducibility of results

More Related Videos

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
11:29

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools

Published on: June 20, 2020

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational therapy education
  • Clinical practice evaluation

Background:

  • Reliable evaluation and feedback are crucial for occupational therapy students' practice education placements.
  • Quality assurance for universities relies on effective student assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a comment bank for the online Student Practice Evaluation Form-Revised Edition (SPEF-R Online).
  • To investigate the reliability of this newly developed comment bank.

Main Methods:

  • A preliminary bank of 109 comments was created based on prior student performance across 11 SPEF-R domains.
  • An online survey assessed comment reliability, with 31 practice educators rating comments on a five-point scale.

Main Results:

  • 102 out of 109 comments showed satisfactory agreement with predefined ratings.
  • Intra-class correlation coefficients (0.86–0.96) indicated good to excellent inter-rater reliability across domains.
  • Only seven comments required minor revisions.

Conclusions:

  • The SPEF-R Online comment bank provides a reliable source of feedback comments.
  • It ensures consistency with the SPEF-R rating scale across all domains.
  • The bank aims to facilitate user-friendly, reliable, and timely feedback for students from practice educators.