Who gets a second heart? A current picture of cardiac retransplantation

M Pozzi1, C d'Alessandro2, F Fernandez2

  • 1Division of Cardiac Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, University "Pierre et Marie Curie", Paris, France; Ph.D. School in Cardiovascular Science, Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy.

Transplantation Proceedings
|February 11, 2014
PubMed

Insights

Heart retransplantation (HRT) shows improved survival rates, with fewer patients needing retransplantation for primary graft failure. This analysis of recent HRT outcomes offers valuable insights for heart transplantation (HT) strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Transplantation Medicine
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Heart retransplantation (HRT) represents a small but significant portion of heart transplantation (HT) procedures.
  • Recent HRT experience was analyzed to evaluate outcomes and compare them with historical data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the outcomes of recent heart retransplantation (HRT) procedures.
  • To compare current HRT results with previous studies published before 2000.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 21 HRT cases performed between January 2000 and June 2012.
  • Indications for HRT included cardiac allograft vasculopathy, graft failure, primary graft failure (PGF), and acute rejection.
  • Overall survival was the primary outcome measure, compared against historical HRT data.

Main Results:

  • The mean age of patients undergoing HRT was 39.9 years, with a male predominance (62%).
  • Overall mortality was 52%, with 30-day mortality at 19%.
  • Actuarial survival rates at 1 month, 1, 3, and 5 years were 81.0%, 70.8%, 59.9%, and 53.3%, respectively. No significant mortality risk factors were identified.

Conclusions:

  • Short- and medium-term survival after HRT has improved.
  • This improvement is attributed to shifts in recipient profiles, with fewer HRTs for PGF and more for late graft failure.
  • Increased PGF rates post-HRT reflect the use of marginal donors to expand the allograft pool.
Abstract