Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

Humanized NOD/SCID/IL2rγnull (hu-NSG) Mouse Model for HIV Replication and Latency Studies
Published on: January 7, 2019
Concentration-response model of lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected pediatric patients
Naïm Bouazza1, Saik Urien, Stéphane Blanche
1From the *EA 3620, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité; †Unité de Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Tarnier; ‡CIC-0901 Inserm, Cochin-Necker; §Unité d'Immunologie, Hématologie et Rhumatologie Pédiatriques, AP-HP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris; ¶Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, AP-HP, Hôpital Cochin-Saint-Vincent-de-Paul, Université Paris-Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France.
Insights
This study analyzed lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) dosing in children with HIV-1. Current guidelines support viral suppression, but higher LPV/r targets may improve efficacy in naive pediatric patients.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Virology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Antiretroviral therapy is crucial for managing HIV-1 infection in children.
- Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) is a key component in pediatric HIV treatment regimens.
- Optimizing LPV/r dosing is essential for achieving viral suppression and improving long-term outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte outcomes with LPV/r in antiretroviral-naive children.
- To evaluate if current LPV/r dosing guidelines achieve a target trough concentration (Ctrough) above 1.0 mg/L.
- To compare the efficacy of World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) dosing recommendations.
Main Methods:
- A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis using an HIV dynamic model was performed.
- 47 antiretroviral-naive children receiving LPV/r-based regimens were studied.
- Simulations compared WHO 2010 and FDA dosing recommendations for viral suppression.
Main Results:
- The HIV dynamic model accurately described the patient data.
- The LPV concentration for 90% effect (CLPV90) was 1.2 mg/L, supporting current guidelines.
- The LPV concentration for 95% effect (CLPV95) was 2.4 mg/L, suggesting a potential for enhanced efficacy.
Conclusions:
- Current LPV/r dosing guidelines are supported by the CLPV90 derived from the model.
- A higher target concentration (CLPV95) of 2.4 mg/L could potentially enhance LPV/r efficacy in treatment-naive children.
- WHO 2010 guidelines appear to offer a higher probability of viral success, especially in infants.
Objectives:
The aims of this study were to analyze the viral load and CD4+ lymphocyte outcomes and the concentration-response of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in the treatment of HIV-1-infected antiretroviral-naive children, to determine whether current dosing guidelines for LPV/r achieve Ctrough above 1.0 mg/L for naive patients to compare efficacy of World Health Organization 2010 and Food and Drug Administration dosing recommendations.
Methods:
Clinical and biologic examinations were performed before treatment, 1 month, 3 months and then every 3 months in 47 antiretroviral-naive children who started an LPV/r-based regimen. LPV concentrations were also monitored on a routine basis, after 2 weeks of treatment initiation, between 1 and 24 hours after dosing in all children. A population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using an HIV dynamic model. Simulations of World Health Organization 2010 and Food and Drug Administration dosing recommendations were compared in terms of viral suppression.
Results:
The HIV dynamic model adequately described the data. According to the concentration-effect curve, the LPV concentration providing 90% (CLPV90) and 95% (CLPV95) of effect were 1.2 and 2.4 mg/L, respectively. The World Health Organization 2010 guidelines should provide a higher probability of viral success, particularly in infants.
Conclusions:
The CLPV90 derived from this model supports current dosing guidelines. However, the target of 2.4 mg/L corresponding to CLPV95 could be used to enhance the efficacy of this drug in treatment-naive children.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Pharmacodynamic Models: Logarithmic Concentration–Effect Model
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution

