Decompressive craniectomy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center matched-pair analysis

Yoichi Uozumi1, Oliver Sakowitz, Berk Orakcioglu

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Kamiiida Dai-ichi General Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Insights

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) did not significantly improve outcomes for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) patients in this study. While not offering a clear advantage, DC may benefit a specific subset of aSAH patients.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurology
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Decompressive craniectomy (DC) use in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial.
  • Evaluating the impact of DC on aSAH patient outcomes is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) in improving outcomes for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

Main Methods:

  • A matched-pair analysis compared 56 aSAH patients who underwent DC with 56 matched controls.
  • Matching criteria included age, gender, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade, Fisher group, and vasospasm occurrence.
  • Outcomes were assessed at 1 month and 1 year post-intervention.

Main Results:

  • At 1 month, 96.4% of DC patients were dependent/dead versus 87.5% of controls (p=0.16).
  • At 1 year, 72.2% of DC patients were dependent/dead versus 55.6% of controls (p=0.11).
  • No significant differences were observed between groups, irrespective of patient characteristics or timing/reason for DC.

Conclusions:

  • Decompressive craniectomy (DC) showed no significant advantage for aSAH patients in this cohort.
  • A notable percentage (over 25%) achieved good long-term outcomes, suggesting potential benefit in specific cases.
  • Further comparative studies are necessary to clarify the role of DC in aSAH management.
Abstract