Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Micro magnetic resonance spectroscopy for noninvasive metabolic screening of mammalian embryos and oocytes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Healthy euploid dizygotic twin birth after transfer of nonmosaic aneuploid embryos.

Fertility and sterility·2025
Same author

Patient perspectives after receiving simulated preconception polygenic risk scores (PRS) for family planning.

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics·2025
Same author

Development and evaluation of a usable blastocyst predictive model using the biomechanical properties of human oocytes.

PloS one·2024
Same author

The first clinical validation of whole-genome screening on standard trophectoderm biopsies of preimplantation embryos.

F&S reports·2024
Same author

Previously uncharacterized rectangular bacterial structures in the dolphin mouth.

Nature communications·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Morphometric Protocol for the Objective Assessment of Blastocyst Behavior During Vitrification and Warming Steps
08:28

Morphometric Protocol for the Objective Assessment of Blastocyst Behavior During Vitrification and Warming Steps

Published on: February 28, 2019

8.4K

Morphological assessment of embryo viability.

Michael Abeyta1, Barry Behr2

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Palo Alto, California.

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine
|February 12, 2014
PubMed
Summary

Morphological assessment of embryos during in vitro development is crucial for grading schemes. Standardization of timing and criteria is needed, with future methods likely integrating genetic screening and time-lapse imaging for improved viability assessment.

More Related Videos

A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult
04:32

A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult

Published on: August 27, 2019

11.4K
A Method for Characterizing Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis
10:24

A Method for Characterizing Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis

Published on: August 4, 2017

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Morphometric Protocol for the Objective Assessment of Blastocyst Behavior During Vitrification and Warming Steps
08:28

Morphometric Protocol for the Objective Assessment of Blastocyst Behavior During Vitrification and Warming Steps

Published on: February 28, 2019

8.4K
A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult
04:32

A Direct and Simple Method to Assess Drosophila melanogaster's Viability from Embryo to Adult

Published on: August 27, 2019

11.4K
A Method for Characterizing Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis
10:24

A Method for Characterizing Embryogenesis in Arabidopsis

Published on: August 4, 2017

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Embryology
  • Reproductive Biology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Morphological assessment is a cornerstone of evaluating embryo development in vitro.
  • Existing literature covers morphological features from oocyte to blastocyst stages.
  • Common morphological features and their biological basis, like multinucleation and fragmentation, require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review current morphological assessment practices in in vitro fertilization (IVF).
  • To debate the inclusion of specific morphological features in embryo grading systems.
  • To highlight limitations and advancements in assessing embryo viability.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on in vitro embryo development and morphological assessment.
  • Analysis of biological rationales for observed phenomena (e.g., multinucleation, fragmentation).
  • Evaluation of current limitations and emerging technologies for viability assessment.

Main Results:

  • Significant literature exists on morphological assessment across all in vitro development stages.
  • Debate continues regarding the inclusion of common morphological features in grading schemes.
  • Developmental timing is a critical factor in morphological assessment, yet standardization is lacking.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization of assessment timing and inclusion criteria is essential for achieving consensus in the field.
  • Future static assessment methods will likely incorporate data from preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and continuous monitoring tools like time-lapse imaging (TLI).
  • Integrating advanced techniques promises more accurate embryo viability assessment.