Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

2.3K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.3K
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

2.4K
Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
2.4K
Nursing Ethical Principles I01:22

Nursing Ethical Principles I

4.7K
Ethical principles serve as the moral compass in the longstanding tradition of nursing, guiding healthcare professionals in their interactions with patients and families. These principles, namely autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, provide a robust framework for navigating the ethical complexities of daily nursing practice.
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...
4.7K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

3.2K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
3.2K
Ethical Dilemmas I01:17

Ethical Dilemmas I

2.1K
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
2.1K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions01:29

Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions

3.3K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ambiguous Invitations: Nonmaleficence, Uncertainty Attitudes and Public Health Policy.

Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal·2026
Same author

Increasing detection of individuals with tuberculosis through engagement of informal health care providers in Northeastern Nigeria.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Incidental diagnosis of a complex cyanotic congenital heart defect in a 32-year-old with orbital abscess.

Cardiology in the young·2025
Same author

Bubble NIPPV: Guidelines for Use.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Implementation costs and cost-effectiveness of ultraportable chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in active case finding for tuberculosis in Nigeria.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

Comparing tuberculosis symptom screening to chest X-ray with artificial intelligence in an active case finding campaign in Northeast Nigeria.

BMC global and public health·2024
Same journal

Neurobiological Determinism versus Human Freedom: Competing Explanatory Models and the Hope for Moral Enhancement.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Zygotes are Persisting Organisms.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Ethical Examination of Genetic Enhancement from the Perspective of Confucian Human Dignity.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Reproducing Anachronism: Ageing, Fertility and Inequality in Reproductive Governance.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Genetic Moral Enhancement-A View Based on Mencius' Theory of Human Nature.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
Same journal

Egalitarian Justice and the Prevalence Principle in Human Genome Editing.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.0K

Patient preference predictors, apt categorization, and respect for autonomy.

Stephen John1

  • 1*Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK. sdj22@cam.ac.uk.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
|February 15, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper examines ethical issues with using a Patient Preference Predictor (PPP) for incapacitated patients. It argues that categorization methods must respect patient autonomy and align with stratified medicine ethics.

Keywords:
Patient Preference Predictorautonomycategorizationincapacitated patientsstratified medicine

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.0K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Medical Ethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • The use of Patient Preference Predictors (PPPs) is proposed to guide care decisions for incapacitated patients.
  • Ethical considerations surrounding patient autonomy and decision-making capacity are paramount in clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze two key ethical complications arising from the use of PPPs for incapacitated patients.
  • To critically evaluate the categorization methods employed by PPPs within the framework of stratified medicine.

Main Methods:

  • The study employs ethical analysis and philosophical argumentation.
  • It examines the "ethics of apt categorization" in stratified medicine.
  • It explores the principle of respecting patient autonomy through potentially endorsable reasons.

Main Results:

  • The paper identifies ethical challenges in how PPPs categorize patients.
  • It demonstrates how certain PPP categorization methods conflict with the ethics of stratified medicine.
  • It argues that respecting patient autonomy imposes limits on acceptable PPP categories.

Conclusions:

  • Concerns about apt categorization pose significant ethical challenges to PPP proposals.
  • Ethically acceptable PPPs must carefully consider patient autonomy and the principles of stratified medicine.
  • The findings relate to existing ethical debates surrounding decision-making for incapacitated patients.